Robbery at Tru Prep thwarted by a familiar face.

[rhaney02]

I’m too pretty to cover up!

MF'er, please....

 

[cmshoot]

MF'er, please....

 

[rhaney02]

View attachment 9772064

Not at all. I know I'm ugly. Gonna keep my hat on.

 

[GeauxLSU]

As a lawyer, I gotta say....

Why?

 

[Burning Love]

"I’ve spent far more time inside a court of law, as well as on advisory boards, investigatory panels, and administrative counsels, dealing with Use of Force issues, policies, and implementation...."


Really? well the world must've changed recently radically because career prosecutors like I was never ask cops questions about use of force. COPS ask other cops such questions ... and Assistant District Attorneys like myself would actually consult with cops at their request or teach cops about the rules on use of force. We (lawyers) were the subject matter experts. We would advise the grand jury and later a trial jury what we thought the law meant and how to apply to the facts of a particular case.

I've prosecuted hundreds of citizens for improper use of force, evaluated dozens more who claimed self-defense as justification, and I've participated in the arrest and prosecution of a few bad officers as well.

Remember, everything you learned or taught by cops for cops is not applicable when you are not a cop and acting under color of authority.

What counts is not what police instructors say or the training manuals at the police academy. What counts is what the actual black-and-white LAWS say: the laws passed by our Georgia General assembly, and case law from prior decisions. Laws which are interpreted
first by cops in the field, then by lawyers, thirdly by judges hearing pretrial motions, fourth by a jury, and fifth (and maybe 6th) by appellate judges.

And when it comes to tort law remember that not only don't you have any immunity but you are vulnerable to getting found liable for a brand new type of tort (civil wrong, basis for a lawsuit).

A tort that --until your case worked its way through the legal system --had never been recognized as a valid cause of action before. New torts are being created and recognized all the time .
You don't get a free warning by being able to say "well there's no clearly established case law that says I can't do that" like you could while cloaked with the official protection of a badge doing a cops job.

I’ve got some friends that are lawyers and I never really understood why so many people made jokes about how awful everyone in that profession is.

I understand why so many people feel that way now.

 

[Pro Carry 2]

Hey if you play stupid games you win hard prizes.

 

[Burning Love]

Good job, Shep.

I’ve spent a lot of time on mats training grappling. I am proud of you and the restraint you used in handling the situation. You subdued her quickly, didn’t even slam your knee down to restrain her, and quickly shifted to a position that is frankly both comfortable and kind to hold her once you saw she wasn’t going to fight back.

It’s both nice to see how thoughtful you were, and sad to see how soft and unfamiliar with the reality of a tussle the people (or in this case, person) that might criticize you are.

 

[41mag]

Nice job !!
Hella entertainment too !

 

[cmshoot]

"I’ve spent far more time inside a court of law, as well as on advisory boards, investigatory panels, and administrative counsels, dealing with Use of Force issues, policies, and implementation...."


Really? well the world must've changed recently radically because career prosecutors like I was never ask cops questions about use of force. COPS ask other cops such questions ... and Assistant District Attorneys like myself would actually consult with cops at their request or teach cops about the rules on use of force. We (lawyers) were the subject matter experts. We would advise the grand jury and later a trial jury what we thought the law meant and how to apply to the facts of a particular case.

I've prosecuted hundreds of citizens for improper use of force, evaluated dozens more who claimed self-defense as justification, and I've participated in the arrest and prosecution of a few bad officers as well.

Remember, everything you learned or taught by cops for cops is not applicable when you are not a cop and acting under color of authority.

What counts is not what police instructors say or the training manuals at the police academy. What counts is what the actual black-and-white LAWS say: the laws passed by our Georgia General assembly, and case law from prior decisions. Laws which are interpreted
first by cops in the field, then by lawyers, thirdly by judges hearing pretrial motions, fourth by a jury, and fifth (and maybe 6th) by appellate judges.

And when it comes to tort law remember that not only don't you have any immunity but you are vulnerable to getting found liable for a brand new type of tort (civil wrong, basis for a lawsuit).

A tort that --until your case worked its way through the legal system --had never been recognized as a valid cause of action before. New torts are being created and recognized all the time .
You don't get a free warning by being able to say "well there's no clearly established case law that says I can't do that" like you could while cloaked with the official protection of a badge doing a cops job.

For the umpteenth time, you have ignorantly or intentionally disregarded my credentials when it comes to handling civilian use of force cases. I would guess it’s a mix of both, as well as cherry picking what you want to hit on. Typical lawyer behavior.

Lawyers such as yourself as SME’s on UoF!? Thanks for the early morning laugh. Your posts have clearly shown your limited grasp of the topic.

If you can’t understand what I have said about my background in instructing civilians in UoF, investigating cases involving the same, and being an SME for UoF REGARDLESS of the person that is using said force, you need to stick to writing obscure books.

It is also obvious that you have some book knowledge, but piss poor knowledge of the actual application of force. That comes from a life spent in classrooms, courtrooms, and behind a desk.

In the video below, someone with rudimentary training can clearly see that I stabilized her head and neck, never letting go until she was on the floor. This is to reduce injuries to those areas, and she was not injuried, nor did she complain of injuries. The floor in the shop is thin vinyl over concrete. If I had desired to cause injury to the subject, she would have been transported in an ambulance and not a paddy wagon.

When the subject became compliant, force immediately ceased, and she was placed in restraints. I monitored the subject continually while waiting for Marietta PD to arrive. She was conscious, breathing normally, with no complaints.

The video shows the restraint used in my UoF.

You are so far out of your depth here that it is comical. You have gone so far as to accuse ME of assaulting YOU in our ODT back-and-forths on the subject. Truly mind boggling.

All you are doing is reinforcing the public’s hatred, disgust, and contempt for lawyers. You keep on digging that hole.

 

[300_whisper]

For the umpteenth time, you have ignorantly or intentionally disregarded my credentials when it comes to handling civilian use of force cases. I would guess it’s a mix of both, as well as cherry picking what you want to hit on. Typical lawyer behavior.

Lawyers such as yourself as SME’s on UoF!? Thanks for the early morning laugh. Your posts have clearly shown your limited grasp of the topic.

If you can’t understand what I have said about my background in instructing civilians in UoF, investigating cases involving the same, and being an SME for UoF REGARDLESS of the person that is using said force, you need to stick to writing obscure books.

It is also obvious that you have some book knowledge, but piss poor knowledge of the actual application of force. That comes from a life spent in classrooms, courtrooms, and behind a desk.

In the video below, someone with rudimentary training can clearly see that I stabilized her head and neck, never letting go until she was on the floor. This is to reduce injuries to those areas, and she was not injuried, nor did she complain of injuries. The floor in the shop is thin vinyl over concrete. If I had desired to cause injury to the subject, she would have been transported in an ambulance and not a paddy wagon.

When the subject became compliant, force immediately ceased, and she was placed in restraints. I monitored the subject continually while waiting for Marietta PD to arrive. She was conscious, breathing normally, with no complaints.

The video shows the restraint used in my UoF.

You are so far out of your depth here that it is comical. You have gone so far as to accuse ME of assaulting YOU in our ODT back-and-forths on the subject. Truly mind boggling.

All you are doing is reinforcing the public’s hatred, disgust, and contempt for lawyers. You keep on digging that hole.

Get rich quick scheme….

Steal gun from truprep, have Shep slam me, hire gagunbooklawyer guy, sue, profit.

Therefore

Theft = profit