You're a terrible lawyer. She has a deadly weapon in her possession. All she needed was ammo, which she could've had in her pocket. She's fortunate she didnt get shot.
-
If you are having trouble with your password change please click here for help.
Robbery at Tru Prep thwarted by a familiar face.
- Thread starter Wombat7
- Start date
You're a terrible THINKER.
She had an *unloaded* gun, that the store employee had just checked and verified was unloaded one second before handing it to her which was less than one second before she started her run with it. So everybody knew it was unloaded and the idea of her bringing her own loaded magazine to fit that model gun into the shop, and loading it on the run without anybody seeing her or noticing it, is flatly ridiculous.
You might as well say that she could've had a CIA assassination wristwatch that would shoot a poison dart out the side to kill any attacker who chases her.
You watch too much TV.
She had an *unloaded* gun, that the store employee had just checked and verified was unloaded one second before handing it to her which was less than one second before she started her run with it. So everybody knew it was unloaded and the idea of her bringing her own loaded magazine to fit that model gun into the shop, and loading it on the run without anybody seeing her or noticing it, is flatly ridiculous.
You might as well say that she could've had a CIA assassination wristwatch that would shoot a poison dart out the side to kill any attacker who chases her.
You watch too much TV.
She may have had a CIA assassin wristwatch.
UoF - Justified.
Court is adjourned
UoF - Justified.
Court is adjourned
Under the Gun Control Act of 1968,
a completed lower receiver or frames is legally a "firearm" too--
so if somebody shoplifts a stripped AR lower or Glock frame and makes a dash, do you think you or some other witness can shoot this "armed robber"??
a completed lower receiver or frames is legally a "firearm" too--
so if somebody shoplifts a stripped AR lower or Glock frame and makes a dash, do you think you or some other witness can shoot this "armed robber"??
You might be a great lawyer. I have no way of knowing and no interest in finding out…
But anyone who would try and bring down the good guy by lying for the bad guy is a pos.
She also had ammunition. Unbeknownst to us, she had shoplifted a box of Aguila 9mm ammunition. It was found in her purse by Marietta PD.
There have been incidents in the past, around the nation, where a customer comes into a gun shop with a loaded magazine, but no gun. They ask to see the appropriate firearm, then they load it, and use it. Actually happened to the other employee in the video when he worked at a different shop.
I was not going to give her the opportunity to load it. I also didn’t want her to make it out of the shop and into a waiting vehicle. If that gun had made it out of the shop, and folks were later injured or killed with it, I would feel culpable. Not gonna happen.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 69,451
- Reaction score
- 82,636
FTFY
Seems to be an attorney on here that thinks objective reasonableness doesnt apply to a criminal stealing a deadly weapon (severity of crime), running/ evading while in possession of a deadly weapon (immediate threat), and attempting to evade. But hey, im just a moron in the peanut gallery. The bar exam must be letting everyone in. To top this all off,
cmshoot
, youre telling me it was a CANIK!? hahaha. Great gun but come on...go for something with a bigger tag lol
Bring down the good guy ??
Hell I Liked his post that he created in the other thread informing us about this incident. Furthermore, I wasn't the first person to mention the idea of excessive force or that the body slam looked "brutal" and "SAVAGE" -- other people brought up this topic first.
I guess HE just feels insecure about lawyers, especially if they don't worship LEO's and automatically assume that they are experts on everything (although he actually *is* an expert on pretty much everything he talks about here at ODT. Including an expert on use of force.
But that doesn't mean he's always right, and that doesn't mean a jury has to go along with his opinion. Many civil lawsuits involve "a battle of the experts" medical experts, engineering experts, product safety experts.
And a case may involve NO EXPERTS at all, if the judge rules that determining how to apply the words, the plain English (non-technical) language, of the statute to the real-world case before them is exclusively a JURY function.
Hell I Liked his post that he created in the other thread informing us about this incident. Furthermore, I wasn't the first person to mention the idea of excessive force or that the body slam looked "brutal" and "SAVAGE" -- other people brought up this topic first.
I guess HE just feels insecure about lawyers, especially if they don't worship LEO's and automatically assume that they are experts on everything (although he actually *is* an expert on pretty much everything he talks about here at ODT. Including an expert on use of force.
But that doesn't mean he's always right, and that doesn't mean a jury has to go along with his opinion. Many civil lawsuits involve "a battle of the experts" medical experts, engineering experts, product safety experts.
And a case may involve NO EXPERTS at all, if the judge rules that determining how to apply the words, the plain English (non-technical) language, of the statute to the real-world case before them is exclusively a JURY function.
I got fiddy for that stripped receiver.
