Shouldering Sig brace is ok now?

[JoKeR50]

ATF seems to be doing another flippity flop. So now the prices of Sig braces will go back up again. I am sure Sig loves the ATF, I mean who else could give a pretty mediocre product more free advertisement. I'll stick with my SBR.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...atf-confirms-firing-ar-15-pistol-shoulder-ok/

 

[wsbrown]

Article is from April 2014

 

[dougiemac]

Article is from April 2014

Bwhahahaha! I'll stick with my news from 2015.

 

[wsbrown]

I think the latest of it was Sig threatened legal action, but then realized the ATF wasn't declaring it illegal to have on a gun, after which they inserted their foot in their mouth and have been quiet about it ever since.

 

[Revolver]

I think the latest of it was Sig threatened legal action, but then realized the ATF wasn't declaring it illegal to have on a gun, after which they inserted their foot in their mouth and have been quiet about it ever since.

It still completely destroyed sales of the thing, and it's still a completely BS ruling. If I fire my Mossberg 500 with a pistol grip, is it now considered a handgun since I redesigned it? LOL. **** the ATF

 

[dougiemac]

It still completely destroyed sales of the thing, and it's still a completely BS ruling. If I fire my Mossberg 500 with a pistol grip, is it now considered a handgun since I redesigned it? LOL. **** the ATF

No that's an entirely different can of worms. It is being considered as a destructive device potentially.

 

[JamesG]

Well there are also those AKM "pistols" which also come with a "shoulder brace" too. So... as long as your "shoulder brace" is nomenclatured as such and detachable, it is not a stock and you do not have a SBR.

 

[JoKeR50]

Sorry guys I got this on a news feed and I was like what the hell. I saw April 3 but didn't notice 2014. Totally my bad. Sorry.

 

[wsbrown]

No worries, I'm waiting for the article that says "NFA repealed"

 

[Gordon Freeman]

MATFKERS