Sig Carry? Safe or Dangerous?

[roydamnmercer]

Are you a politician? Do you work for sig? That's some great spin using a term like "unintentional discharge" to hide the faults of the 320 platform.

Do you read and comprehend English? Did I give Sig a pass or make excuses? I mean, I literally said in several ways that I was “not saying they’re safe” or that those “100+ discharges weren’t insignificant”. That’s hardly Sig PR talk acknowledging the risks. Pretty crappy PR campaign if it is. No, I don’t work for Sig but I do carry a 365, yetI’m not a brand loyalist or snob. I carry what fits, functions and wears well.

I was just reminded of all the Glock “kaboom” memes and threads from back in the day. Everyone was convinced that a Glock 22 or Glock 23 was going to blow up in their hand like a grenade because the “unsupported chamber design flaw”. Plenty of photographic evidence to support it too, apparently. 🙄

And using “unintentional” is merely semantics. Compared to the 18,000 “unintentional discharges” cited because those stats are not separated into accidental/negligent/uncommanded.

Haters gonna hate, fanboys gonna fanboy and trolls gonna troll, I guess. Sig 320’s are like abortions…if you don’t like them, don’t get one. And don’t worry about those who do…they’ll answer for it one day. Or maybe not. 🤷‍♂️

 

[charlie hotel lima]

It's all A.I. It keeps everyone from asking about the Epstein fella'...or why the White House needs a Ball Room. "Glocks Rule The World"...or something like that. And why Bypass can't make up his mind..

 

[ReservoirDawg10]

Do you read and comprehend English? Did I give Sig a pass or make excuses? I mean, I literally said in several ways that I was “not saying they’re safe” or that those “100+ discharges weren’t insignificant”. That’s hardly Sig PR talk acknowledging the risks. Pretty crappy PR campaign if it is. No, I don’t work for Sig but I do carry a 365, yetI’m not a brand loyalist or snob. I carry what fits, functions and wears well.

I was just reminded of all the Glock “kaboom” memes and threads from back in the day. Everyone was convinced that a Glock 22 or Glock 23 was going to blow up in their hand like a grenade because the “unsupported chamber design flaw”. Plenty of photographic evidence to support it too, apparently. 🙄

And using “unintentional” is merely semantics. Compared to the 18,000 “unintentional discharges” cited because those stats are not separated into accidental/negligent/uncommanded.

Haters gonna hate, fanboys gonna fanboy and trolls gonna troll, I guess. Sig 320’s are like abortions…if you don’t like them, don’t get one. And don’t worry about those who do…they’ll answer for it one day. Or maybe not. 🤷‍♂️

I read and comprehend information well above average.

Sad part is plenty of people, your input to the thread included, can't compretend what they write. It's easy to put out random facts and numbers pulled by Google or chatgpt and regurgitate the information in useless manners. Actually understanding and comprehending the information and terminology used is a whole different game. Clearly, very few people actually understand the differences.

 

[Tony2X]

 

[Tony2X]

Yeah he was trying to get it to discharge and it wasn’t pointed in a safe direction and he destroyed his hand.

 

[traderSouthga]

Doubt he probably just bumped into a table. It hit his artery and he bled out.

 

[traderSouthga]

I image whoever got there removed it from his body and put it on the counter if it was like a quick remove holster

 

[joel2000]

Hickok 45 stated in a video posted just a couple of days ago…he didn’t trust the P320.

 

[Ken Ford]

Do you read and comprehend English? Did I give Sig a pass or make excuses? I mean, I literally said in several ways that I was “not saying they’re safe” or that those “100+ discharges weren’t insignificant”. That’s hardly Sig PR talk acknowledging the risks. Pretty crappy PR campaign if it is. No, I don’t work for Sig but I do carry a 365, yetI’m not a brand loyalist or snob. I carry what fits, functions and wears well.

I was just reminded of all the Glock “kaboom” memes and threads from back in the day. Everyone was convinced that a Glock 22 or Glock 23 was going to blow up in their hand like a grenade because the “unsupported chamber design flaw”. Plenty of photographic evidence to support it too, apparently. 🙄

And using “unintentional” is merely semantics. Compared to the 18,000 “unintentional discharges” cited because those stats are not separated into accidental/negligent/uncommanded.

Haters gonna hate, fanboys gonna fanboy and trolls gonna troll, I guess. Sig 320’s are like abortions…if you don’t like them, don’t get one. And don’t worry about those who do…they’ll answer for it one day. Or maybe not. 🤷‍♂️

I brought up all the problems of Glock including the chamber and drop problems.
We seriously considered changing to sigs at one point. We kept glocks.

 

[traderSouthga]

I brought up all the problems of Glock including the chamber and drop problems.
We seriously considered changing to signs at one point. We kept glocks.

Hey man just cause talks sig sucks don’t mean you get to go hounding on Glocks.