So what happened to Flight 370

[GeauxLSU]

do you think Bush and Cheny did this too? lol

Duh, obviously.

 

[white]

Chem trails

 

[swampbuck62]

Duh, obviously.

lmao

 

[ddennis]

I don't think it crashed. I think it was landed somewhere and is going to be used in an attack somewhere.

 

[atljetmech]

Chem trails

Is that what chem lights leave?

 

[CQB27]

Radar is literally everywhere circumnavigating the globe and continually recording, although the data has to be rewound and analyzed. China US UK Russia knows where it's at or where went off course., They're brainstorming to come up with the most palatable news story that doesn't scare the world and cause the markets to drop and the fragile world economies slump even further

The above highlighted portion of your statement is 100% wrong. RADAR installations are land based and Trans-oceanic flights are not in RADAR contact for most of the course over open ocean. Position Reporting fixes where an aircraft is and is expected to be next. How do I know? Because I have done it.

While the missing aircraft may have been in radar contact when it disappeared, the statement that all aircraft over open ocean are in RADAR contact is 100% false and helps fuel the tinfoil conspires.

 

[Sagan]

Horse shoes. Radar is everywhere. Icbm's are no different than fast jets.

Except, they go really, really fast, and at much higher altitudes.

 

[CQB27]

Horse shoes. Radar is everywhere. Icbm's are no different than fast jets.

ICBMs are traced/tracked using satellites, but feel free to reject reality and substitute your own

 

[Sagan]

So therefore slower, larger and lower flying over vast deserts of emptiness will be easier to decipher

Not if it was taken by aliens. They have stealth capabilities.

 

[CQB27]

NASA analyzes the composition of micron-size items at a million miles distance and you tell me I'm promoting tin foil for suggesting every square meter on Earth is continually monitored,

Again, I have piloted AC on Trans-Oceanic flights and I know for a fact "RADAR is literally everywhere circumnavigating the globe" is 100% wrong.

"Radar is everywhere, Icbm's are no different than fast jets" is 100% wrong.

"NASA analyzes the composition of micron-size items at a million miles distance and you tell me I'm promoting tin foil for suggesting every square meter on Earth is continually monitored"---100% correct.

You display the pattern often seen in the tinfoil hat crowd. Make an incorrect statement, get called on it, without even attempting to defend it, move on to another incorrect statement, get called on it....and so on.