• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

UPDATE 10/3 - Injunction covers all FPC members - ATF publishes their pistol brace rule

So long story short, you are complying with this buffoonery?
No. Not for braced guns that I had no intention of turning into an SBR. I'm going to do nothing with them. Not taking off the brace, not registering ship. They cant make the laws. If they think they can, then so can I. I'll hand them over a paper where I sharpie'd my new law that allows TheSnail to be exempt from form-4 or form-1 taxation or registration.
 
If you remove the brace from the AR pistol you would be “legal” again. Correct?

“This rule is effective the date it is published in the Federal Register. Any weapons with “stabilizing braces” or similar attachments that constitute rifles under the NFA must be registered no later than 120 days after date of publication in the Federal Register; or the short barrel removed and a 16-inch or longer rifle barrel attached to the firearm; or permanently remove and dispose of, or alter, the “stabilizing brace” such that it cannot be reattached; or the firearm is turned in to your local ATF office. Or the firearm is destroyed.”
 
With how widespread illegal glock full auto switches are with criminals in Chicago and elsewhere, I take ATF infringement on the rights of law abiding citizens as an affront to our constitutionally guaranteed rights, and a challenge against us to show up in _every_ election to vote.

Imagine a hornets nest of determined republican voters.
Because people in Chicago with full auto switches are willing to use those glocks on law enforcement without hesitation. A republican voter is cucked and wouldn't even dream of resisting arrest let alone raising arms against law enforcement. Hence why cops have zero problems going in with a full stack on some accountant in Marietta but won't go anywhere near the bankhead or college park.
 
If you remove the brace from the AR pistol you would be “legal” again. Correct?

“This rule is effective the date it is published in the Federal Register. Any weapons with “stabilizing braces” or similar attachments that constitute rifles under the NFA must be registered no later than 120 days after date of publication in the Federal Register; or the short barrel removed and a 16-inch or longer rifle barrel attached to the firearm; or permanently remove and dispose of, or alter, the “stabilizing brace” such that it cannot be reattached; or the firearm is turned in to your local ATF office. Or the firearm is destroyed.”
No. Stop trying to hope into existence a loophole that doesn't exist. ANY gun that possesses a barrel of <16 inches is an SBR. Plain and simple. They have written this law to completely encompass the front end of the gun. Whats on the back end of the gun is completely and utterly irrelevant. If the barrel is <16 inches it's an SBR. That's it. They've written this ruling so that no loophole that allows an unregistered <16 inch gun is possible.
 
They are saying braces themselves are not an illegal item. If you form 1 your gun and then wanna use a brace instead of a stock like a person with a brain then you are allowed to. AFTER you form 1 your gun.
Its disgusting Man. Voters need to have this voiced out clearly in a Y/N line item in a std. election, NOT some dweeb agency issuing Fiats that clearly go against the intent of the bill of rights, this ATF fiat is completely disgusting. Who do these people really think they are?
 
Its disgusting Man. Voters need to have this voiced out clearly in a Y/N line item in a std. election, NOT some dweeb agency issuing Fiats that clearly go against the intent of the bill of rights, this ATF fiat is completely disgusting. Who do these people really think they are?
Voting will not fix this problem. The ATF is simply a symptom of the entrenched problems in a modern society. The fact is 70% of the American population if not more do not believe in many of the values in the constitution nor bill of rights and many of them would gladly trade freedom for security. You need not look further than every other western nation outside of the United States if you need proof of what I'm saying. This is what was inevitable with the passing of the 19th amendment.

Even "republican women" are leaned towards being anti-gun unless peer pressured by males in some kind of social group or if they stand to benefit directly from taking a pro-gun stance. If you leave women to their own devices they would universally oppose guns irrelevant of where they lean politically. It's in their nature. So then they pass these values onto their offsprings and with single mother households on an alarming rise; the rest is obvious. This is what happens when there are no exterior or existential threats to a population. They start thinking warriors and the tools for warriors are barbaric and unnecessary.
 
Voting will not fix this problem. The ATF is simply a symptom of the entrenched problems in a modern society. The fact is 70% of the American population if not more do not believe in many of the values in the constitution nor bill of rights and many of them would gladly trade freedom for security. You need not look further than every other western nation outside of the United States if you need proof of what I'm saying.
I'm scheming on Pro-2A Political Action Committee donations, But I don't have all of the answers. What is your recommended set of countermeasures, Sir.
 
Back
Top Bottom