Yep, click bait. They haven't shut down my account. I shipped a rifle off to another member/ffl yesterday via UPS.
Yep.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, click bait. They haven't shut down my account. I shipped a rifle off to another member/ffl yesterday via UPS.
I thought they'd relaxed the rule if a museum curator had exhibited a pistol as an antique about 14 years ago. I may have read that in a discussion group. Not on the USPS website.USPS hasn't shipped handguns from a C&R as long as I've had an 03, 20+ years.
That sounds quite specific. There may be subtleties in there for institutions, special circumstance. My local PO has a hissy fit about long guns. Certainly handguns have been verboten in the regs last time a looked, (a fair while ago), and refused both here and in IL. YMMV.I thought they'd relaxed the rule if a museum curator had exhibited a pistol as an antique about 14 years ago. I may have read that in a discussion group. Not on the USPS website.
I try to stay current. I'm the reason the mouth breathing morons at the College Street station had to undergo remedial training on firearms shipping regulations.
Well, kinda. If they won't ship unserialized frames; does that also affect an 07 FFL that orders forgings to finish and serialize? I can think of several members on here that could cause issues for.
Also rough forgings and 80% completed frames/receivers are two completely different animals.The way I read the ATF rule that's a whole different thing. The 07 would be responsible for serializing them and UPS hasn't said anything about not shipping TO an FFL, just from an FFL to a non-FFL.
why shouldnt they?this is the thing..
a company has the right to choose what it does and who it serves.
but
when a company works to corner the market and controls about 1/3 of its service,should it be able to limit legal companies from using the service it worked so hard to limit competition in?
should a power company be able to shut off power to someone they dont approve of?
Exactly what my post is addressing abovd. It should be wrong.why shouldnt they?
This is exactly the kind of issue libertarians cannot comprehend.