Going to the moon is like a GA ODT member going to buy a gun - a gun like Pat Garretts six-shooter the one that killed Billy the Kid in 1881 its a Wild West relic that last sold for six million dollars its a gun there is only one so its not for sale so the asking price is 18 million . Most of the technical genius of the moon landing like sat5s - punch cards - tubular underwear etc....... are relics and the prowess or status of the that gun or the moon landing is not a worthy ambition. Wild Wild West relics or moon landings may become a status symbol or a member may inherit 18 million then find out he can flip the six shooter to chairman chai or Phil Collins for 25 million HEY then there is a plausible possibility
-
If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.
Wow! With an open mind watch these videos. Landed on the moon or a huge fake and no country has ever landed on the moon?
- Thread starter testdepth
- Start date
How can one be sure the artifacts and instruments are actually on the moon, and not just on a movie set somewhere?
Or worse, just digitally produced and manipulated images.
Well, building a movie set that sails across the sky over my house entry night is pretty impressive too.
lol this same people will tell you bigfoot is real and that they have 4 clans in north ga 
Well, the moon probably does that also, but that doesn't mean we've been there.
Bigfoot is real...I know i dated a female in High School...lol this same people will tell you bigfoot is real and that they have 4 clans in north ga
skepticism is good but you seem convinced it is a hoax - propaganda elaborate hoaxes as well as outright lies are common I get that - but I often hear - there was no holocaust - there was no sandy hook shooting - there was no moon landing etc... and I think this is evidence of a tightly held world view or virtue signal rather than skepticism Ive spoken to astronauts and seen raw photos and videos and I was able to look clearly at shadows of objects that are there through a telescope by someone who had demonstrated it a few times
It could have been a hoax. Remember, this is the same cast of characters that murdered JFK, so don't put anything past them. The guy in the first video, however, is a clown. Rarely, if ever, do you place your entire argument/case on one piece of alleged evidence. Could he prove or offer evidence that there wasn't two separate, natural light sources? Apparently not. The man discussing what his dad told him was compelling.
I'm 50-50 on it.
I'm 50-50 on it.
