• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

9/11: What really happened

Saudi Hijackers flew two 747's into the Twin Towers which then collapsed on themselves.

  • Yes

  • No

  • Tacos


Results are only viewable after voting.
Case in point, I recently watched a documentary on the JFK assassination where a Hollywood special effects specialist showed his “evidence” that the event was actually staged to protect Kennedy and his family and based on his assessment, Kennedy was actually never shot. He believes that Hollywood-type blood squibs were used to fake the shooting. He went so far as to say that Jackie didn’t get out of the back seat to get pieces of Jack’s skull, but to obtain pieces of the squib itself as that would be a dead giveaway of the faked shooting. In this theory, police officer J.D. Tippit, looked a lot like Kennedy and his dead body was actually the one that went to Parkland hospital. Interesting documentary but I don’t buy it.
Solid post, thanks. I also watched that ^ documentary. It's an interesting theory but I, like you, didn't buy it.
 
Solid post, thanks. I also watched that ^ documentary. It's an interesting theory but I, like you, didn't buy it.
thanks. Maybe it has already been asked and answered, but if planes didn’t hit the towers, what happened to Flight 11 and Flight 175 and the people that boarded them?
 
Bill Cooper just before he died claimed an attack was coming and they would blame Bin Laden. It's on tape and easily searchable. Also, yeah a Tylenol OD is a rough way to choose to go for a PhD level biochemist.
 
Well, then there's the whole argument about how the planes appear to be traveling at an airspeed below what would need to be required to keep them aloft at such low altitudes. I've only read a little bit about that but the theory is that for them to be aloft at that low of an altitude, they should have had to have been (what verb tense is that, by the way?) flying much faster than they appeared to be.
Large aircraft speeds can be deceiving. I used to watch the C-5 and C-17 fly overhead. They appeared to not be moving at all.

 
IMG_7437.jpeg
Here we have a piece of Epsteins art. Paper planes…2 crumbled jenga towers… Bush..
no thanks lol
It was CGI. No planes.
 
Huh...you're absolutely right. I pulled it on my laptop and watched it fullscreen. I guess I was doing the same thing she was. Focusing on the smoke. My eyes aren't what they used to be, I guess. Good catch.
We live in a video age in 2023 and expect everything that happens to have a video to support it. People weren't walking around in 2001 with HD 16.9 cameras in their pocket like they do today. Things occur without a video.
 
View attachment 6215238Here we have a piece of Epsteins art. Paper planes…2 crumbled jenga towers… Bush..
no thanks lol
It was CGI. No planes.
This was painted in 2012. The artist is Petrina Ryan-Kleid and it was painted as part of her senior thesis. And it was never owned by Epstein. Parsing Bill, the one of Clinton in the blue dress was owned by Epstein. They were both painted by the same artist.

And thank you for showing up to rep the "no planes" crowd. I knew y'all were out there. :thumb:
 
Watch this:

We used bin Laden and then double crossed him.
OK. I'm three minutes in and the guy is just rambling about surveillance in Korea in the 70's. :ranger:

There it is....@ 3:56 he finally says 9/11.

Eh....I mean.....maybe? He's a little bit of a rambling old man who says that his "kinesthetic belly" told him something was wrong with a photo. If I'm in the "missile did it" camp - and I am - his isn't the testimony on which I'm hanging my hat.

As to the bin Laden connection, I just don't get it. How would we have possibly "double crossed him?"
 
You're waking up romi.

No plane hit the pentagon, that was a detonation

Tower 7 falling in the location it sits is an unexplainable phenomenon

Bin laden was a cia operative

There were no wmds

And lastly, jet fuel don't melt steel beams
 
We live in a video age in 2023 and expect everything that happens to have a video to support it. People weren't walking around in 2001 with HD 16.9 cameras in their pocket like they do today. Things occur without a video.
Oh, I absolutely agree. Heck, camcorders weren't even cheap enough then to be readily affordable.
 
Back
Top Bottom