• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

Father shoots 17 year old daughters BF in her bed. She told dad she didn't know him.

Last edited:
bulldawg165 said:
Well, apparently the law says he is ok. I was under the impression that the "alter ego" doctrine (AKA "Step into the shoes" doctrine) should rule but it appears I was wrong

http://nationalparalegal.edu/public...iles/criminalLaw/defenses/DefenseofOthers.asp

I still personally feel as though the alter ego rule should ALWAYS apply, however.
Click to expand...

So I should consider and put your "shoes" feelings in priority over mine, even in a situation where your "shoes" are a logically perceived threat to mine?

Sounds like some libtard sh*t. If someone is a realistic potential threat to my or my family's safety, I'll blast the Keds or nikes back to Walmart before I'm even the slightest bit concerned with how they feel.
 
bradlee787 said:
So I should consider and put your "shoes" feelings in priority over mine, even in a situation where your "shoes" are a logically perceived threat to mine?

Sounds like some libtard sh*t. If someone is a realistic potential threat to my or my family's safety, I'll blast the Keds or nikes back to Walmart before I'm even the slightest bit concerned with how they feel.
Click to expand...

This makes no sense whatsoever. The "Step into the shoes" doctrine is when you step into the shoes of the person that you are defending. If they don't have a legal right to self defense then you don't have a legal right to defend them. It has absolutely nothing to do with the alleged perpetrator.

My point is that I personally feel that you can't legally defend someone who can't legally defend themselves. This girl couldn't legally use self defense and shoot the kid for the actions as they unfolded, therefore I don't think the father should have legally been allowed to either.

Do you think any charges should be brought for this kid's murder?
 
Last edited:
bulldawg165 said:
So you think no criminal charges should be filed whatsoever?

Plus, isn't she 16? I don't think you can sue a minor but I could be wrong.
Click to expand...
I would assume for CRIMINAL charges you'd have to prove she intended harm which presumably she did not. The boy's death (again AS PRESENTED) falls on her shoulders. I would imagine the civil court is the remedy but perhaps there is a criminal avenue.
 
GeauxLSU said:
I would assume for CRIMINAL charges you'd have to prove she intended harm which presumably she did not. The boy's death (again AS PRESENTED) falls on her shoulders. I would imagine the civil court is the remedy but perhaps there is a criminal avenue.
Click to expand...

Intent isn't necessary for a crime to have been committed. Plus, as I already mentioned, I don't think you can go after a 16 year old in civil court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lady Shoots Her New Roommate
Replies
2
Views
202
palmettomoon
palmettomoon
Oh, she is a good shooter.
2
Replies
13
Views
459
basstracker89
B
She would witness her last sunrise
2
Replies
18
Views
768
Wile E. Coyote 5.0
Wile E. Coyote 5.0

Featured Listings!

Back
Top Bottom