Thanks for proving my point about your bias. As I posted earlier, it is always okay to defend yourself. If a dog is damaging your property, defend your property. That's just common sense. But that's not what you have said. You have made the ridiculous claim that any dog that is not leashed is feral and should be killed.yes, they have a choice, i had none.
why is it always fair for us to deal with peoples dogs running loose? why do i need to lose my pets and property first?
why is someones right to let their animals run and destroy on my property always more important than my right to keep my property safe?
i just dont get it. if i was to come on you land, chase and or kill your animals. rummage thru your trash, harass your family and make them afraid. would you let it go?
you guys seem to have some seriously democratic views when it comes to dogs.... is it just dogs? what if i had an overly large cat, or a large monitor lizard a python. would you be upset if i let it roam free. what if it ate your dogs, would you be ok with shooting it?
you guys love dogs, you attach some human qualities to them. but if they have the human traits to earn human rights, then they must be held to human standards. now i know you cant shoot a person for running dear, but you can most certainly shoot one for threatening you, or breaking into you home.
as pretty as it is, it could easily take a small to medium dog.
![]()
how about this
![]()
or this
![]()
none of these are common, but loose dogs killing animals are..
If a man is attacking you, kill him. Does that mean you should kill a man for walking into your yard? That's the standard you have set about a dog.



