Stamp Creek? I guess that's off limits now too.These came off of Pine Log, so I have nothing remotely nice to say about the property owners. View attachment 5784699View attachment 5784700View attachment 5784701
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stamp Creek? I guess that's off limits now too.These came off of Pine Log, so I have nothing remotely nice to say about the property owners. View attachment 5784699View attachment 5784700View attachment 5784701
I read an article about the proposed development of that land. I think it is 19,000 acres with a lot of different types of live/work/play plans. That is drastically going to change that area.
Yes it isStamp Creek? I guess that's off limits now too.
I mean I get what you’re talking about, but it has been public for 46 years. This is not some strictly private property that none of us could be on in the first place. Who paid the property taxes on it for 46 years the public buying hunting and fishing license not the property owner. My thing with is from what it sounds like to me they weren’t even willing to work with the state. I will never understand why people side with them. If **** doesn’t start changing around here in just a short time none of us will have a place to hunt, hike, fish, or anything.We love capitalism until capitalists do what they do then we hate ‘em for it. We hate socialism until we need them to do what they do and then we practically beg them for it.
Ironic, isn’t it?
It was leased to the public for 46 years by a family who owned it…why would the owner pay property taxes during that time when it’s being used for public use? The state pays them to lease it but I’m sure the family paid income tax on that money. If they sell it or keep it private, believe me, the state is going to get their share! If you owned land and the state was paying you $XX,XXX a year to lease it but some developer came and offered you $XX,XXX,XXX to sell it, you wouldn’t take the money for you and your kids? Please! Everyone loves altruism but few ever practice it themselves.I mean I get what you’re talking about, but it has been public for 46 years. This is not some strictly private property that none of us could be on in the first place. Who paid the property taxes on it for 46 years the public buying hunting and fishing license not the property owner. My thing with is from what it sounds like to me they weren’t even willing to work with the state. I will never understand why people side with them. If **** doesn’t start changing around here in just a short time none of us will have a place to hunt, hike, fish, or anything.
Interesting piece of history of you'd care to share.......?I’m just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. Yeah there is plenty of places to hunt now, but before too long that way of thinking there will be no places. Your right if I bought property I wouldn’t let every Tom, Dick, or Harry hunt it, but I also wouldn’t lease it to the state for 46 years, waiting until I see ****ing dollar signs from some developers. Either way they are gonna do what they want and I can’t change that but I damn sure I ain’t gonna talk nice about them. I know how they got the land in the first place and they are trying to paint them selfs as these saints that only leased it to the state for the public and you would be a damn moron if you believed that.