• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

Sig Carry? Safe or Dangerous?

I have several. I also have Glocks, Berettas, HKs, and S&Ws. I am not a brand loyalist and don’t get emotionally wrapped up in my choice in firearms or what others choose to carry.

I am old enough to remember when this idiocy happened with Glock in the 80s, 90s, and into the early 2000s. The only difference now is we have social media totally blowing things out of proportion and every choad with a camera jumping online to claim they discovered the problem. Suddenly over night the internet became mechanical engineers and declared something unsafe based on rumors and conjecture.

My EDC is a SIG. I also own many brands and am old enough to remember the Glock stuff. I still believe there is something wrong with the P320 platform but am fine with you not thinking the same.
 
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6935.png
    IMG_6935.png
    503.5 KB · Views: 14
I learned this morning that my shooting club is considering banning the 320. The powers that be are waiting on Grayguns to finish an investigation into all of this. Not sure what that is, but will find out.
I think the whole 320 thing is over blown nonsense. However, I wouldn’t trust anything BG has to say on the subject. He proved he was compromised back in 2017 during the 320 drop gate scandal. Back then he swore it couldn’t go off by being dropped and claimed they had one they threw around the office.


I love the editors note at the end.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Sig Sauer has addressed this issue since this article was published. The information Sig provided is not in line with Bruce’s input. With this being still early in the overall development of the entire story, we choose to keep this published. No matter the outcome, Grayguns, LLC is still a premier business to work with for customization of Sig Sauer pistols and Bruce Gray is still a subject matter expert with Sig Sauer pistols
 
Two things to consider in this investigation regarding the Airman's death.

1. This potentially being caused by negligence or intentional maliciousness, does not mean there isn't a problem with the P320. There is still plenty of evidence out there supporting that claim. Again, I understand not wanting to immediately condemn a product until all the facts come out. But I equally do not understand defending a product that is currently shrouded in controversy and suspicion.

2. There is plenty of reason to be suspicious of SIG's relationship with the US military in general. And if they have the alleged influence and ability to secure any and all contracts they desired, is it hard to believe they can have this incident swept under the rug and the blame placed elsewhere?


We'll see how it all plays out. But just because a multi-billion dollar corporation with ties to the government gets "exonerated," does that mean they're innocent? E.G. The Epstein files supposedly aren't real now....
 
It’s the military any time there’s an ND it’s always the soldiers fault. We had several issues with saw triggers getting stuck, and NDs with the crow system. The COC always found a way to pin it back on the soldier. The crow systems were so bad getting them loaded that we would load them about a click or 2 away from the FOB before a mission and have the weapon oriented toward a hill side.

Not saying it’s right, just that’s what military culture is.
 
Back
Top Bottom