- Joined
- Sep 20, 2012
- Messages
- 4,006
- Reaction score
- 1,852
Anyone heard anything more on the stabilizing braces?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hopefully someone will digest all of this and give a simple explanation....
This proposed rule would not affect “stabilizing braces” that are objectively designed and intended as a “stabilizing brace” for use by individuals with disabilities.
One of the parts that pisses me off the most is that there's companies out there that spent untold fortunes doing R&D and making sure they were in compliance. So then they got greenlighted with permission slip letters from the ATF and started producing and selling their products. The Man said it was all legal and fine. And THEN they wanna go back on their word and move the goal posts. Granted I know they have been doing this same **** since 1934 but it's still wrong as hell. How many jobs and businesses stand to be lost ? The entire firearms industry needs to lawyer up real good and then show the brace letter or the damn binary trigger letter or Shockwave letter to the Feds and the courts and say " YOU said this was legal and good to go. WE did our due diligence beforehand. So **** you! "I doubt they will follow up on that...That was when they still had to deal with Trump.
You can bet the rules are already written and ready to go. The only reason they are delaying is so they can get this gun control nut confirmed as head of the ATF. Once he's in place he'll do whatever he wants with no checks or balances at all.
I'm sure he would be perfectly happy to simply roll back all the decision letters and make braces just as illegal as anything but a bare buffer tube used to be.
This proposed rule would not affect “stabilizing braces” that are objectively designed and intended as a “stabilizing brace” for use by individuals with disabilities.
I feel my arthritis acting up.
....