Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could see this argument working IF the suppressor was physically welded onto a firearm. Perhaps that's what some companies should do at this pointCongress can define what a "firearm" is however it wants... and it already declared that a silencer (to use the term used by Hiram Maxim who invented and popularized the device 120 years ago)
*is* a type of firearm.

Congress can define what a "firearm" is however it wants... and it already declared that a silencer (to use the term used by Hiram Maxim who invented and popularized the device 120 years ago)
*is* a type of firearm.
Just like Congress can and did declare that a "firearm" that is an antique is not really a firearm, even though it can kill you stone cold dead and millions of people WERE killed with such antiques between the time firearms were invented and the year 1898 when Congress drew the line for defining an antique.
No court is going to overturn that and say that judges have the power to define what a fireaRm is contrary to what Congress specified.
Sounds like dead center….I was at a gun store/range in Buford last week and whilst filling out a 4473 heard two employees talking and one told the other that they were just going to raise the prices "at least $100" on NFA items. That same store is under an LLC with other stores/ranges in the area. Many thought this could possibly happen, but it stung hearing it firsthand.
Doesn't really matter when you purchase IMO because folks/businesses are going to act scummy and you'll still be paying the same or about the same price until the market corrects itself. Just need to decide if you want to give money to the feds or businesses taking advantage of the situation.
If they raise the price because demand is higher, then that is normal market behavior. I believe there will be a spike in demand among people for whom the $200 tax was a barrier. But I think that is a relatively small group. If you are already capable of paying $1000+ for a suppressor, then you can also afford the stamp. Sure, for cheaper cans or rimfire cans that cost $300-$500, then maybe we will see more of an increase in demand as the stamp cost was higher relative to the cost of the can itself and that probably held people back more.I was at a gun store/range in Buford last week and whilst filling out a 4473 heard two employees talking and one told the other that they were just going to raise the prices "at least $100" on NFA items. That same store is under an LLC with other stores/ranges in the area. Many thought this could possibly happen, but it stung hearing it firsthand.
Doesn't really matter when you purchase IMO because folks/businesses are going to act scummy and you'll still be paying the same or about the same price until the market corrects itself. Just need to decide if you want to give money to the feds or businesses taking advantage of the situation.
It's also called capitalism. I have a love/hate relationship with it.If they raise the price because demand is higher, then that is normal market behavior.
It really doesn't make any sense and it's definitely shady and taking advantage of the situation. Sadly, I don't think it will fade quickly as there will be people who will still pay $100 extra for it.A shop raising the price $100 or more simply because there is no tax stamp now makes no sense as that money never went in their pocket anyway. It only makes sense as a response to demand and I think that will fade quickly in any case. Obviously I may be proven wrong, we'll see.
I understand basic supply and demand principles, but for the purposes of brevity, that's not what the conversation I overheard alluded to.If they raise the price because demand is higher, then that is normal market behavior. I believe there will be a spike in demand among people for whom the $200 tax was a barrier. But I think that is a relatively small group. If you are already capable of paying $1000+ for a suppressor, then you can also afford the stamp. Sure, for cheaper cans or rimfire cans that cost $300-$500, then maybe we will see more of an increase in demand as the stamp cost was higher relative to the cost of the can itself and that probably held people back more.
But for most people who don't have a suppressor already, I think it's the paperwork issue and that remains in place under this legislation.
I think you are going to see a surge in Form 1s, especially for SBRs and SBSs, and Form 4s to trusts though.
A shop raising the price $100 or more simply because there is no tax stamp now makes no sense as that money never went in their pocket anyway. It only makes sense as a response to demand and I think that will fade quickly in any case. Obviously I may be proven wrong, we'll see.
I'll avoid saying the actual name, but it's one without the 100 yard range (there are only two in Buford). It's part of the same LLC as a store/range in Lawrenceville.Please, tell me who’s trying to increase their price by $100 so I can ensure they never get my business.
Opportunistic scumbags.