• All users have been asked to change their passwords. This is just a precaution. Thanks!
  • If you are having trouble with your password change please click here for help.

Supreme Court Overrules Chevron Doctrine and now The ATF is screwed along with all federal agency's.

This puts an end to a lot of that. See? It’s good news.
The absolutely corrupt and traitorous alphabet agencies are suddenly going to be nice to John Q Public? It's funny so many actually believe that's going to happen. They are the shadow government, they make it their own rules and know how to navigate around the law
 
The absolutely corrupt and traitorous alphabet agencies are suddenly going to be nice to John Q Public? It's funny so many actually believe that's going to happen. They are the shadow government, they make it their own rules and know how to navigate around the law
I didn’t say that. Actually, you’re right. We should all just give up. Turn in your guns, surrender your privacy and live off of the .gov tit. Great plan.
 
Chevron deference (or lack thereof) doesn't affect how federal agencies deal with the public.

It affects how federal District Court judges decide cases before then when somebody complains they got screwed by a federal agency.

Which, in turn, affects how federal agencies deal with the public.
 
The bump stock decision is an example of the judiciary determining if an agency's interpretation of a regulation is legitimate or not. The court did not say the ATF couldn't ban something it said it could not ban bump stocks using the current laws definition of a machine gun.
 
I'm sure there will be 'test' cases... and I wouldn't be surprised if some of them had to go back up the food chain for clarification, just like we're seeing with Bruen in the 2A space.

That being said, getting rid of this Regan-era practice is a huge win that will pin back the ears of the executive branch going forward.

I did have to laugh at some of the articles I read this morning though.

Places like Politico complaining that Presidents wouldn't be able to make up new laws as they go to fix things like climate change and student loan debt. And complaining that Congress would get mired down in the details of new legislation instead of attending to big, important issues.
I watched some airhead liberal woman this morning whining that this decision would weaken the power of gooberment agencies to enact de facto laws and create legislation without having to go through our elected representatives.
She thinks that's a bad thing:crazy:
We will never find common ground with these people especially as they appear to all be clinically insane and anyone with any experience knows you can't reason with crazy.
 
Back
Top Bottom