Do you think this philosophy should only apply to products/goods, or should it extend to behavior/actions?My whole thought is, that I don't care if it is harmless, dangerous, deadly, violent, etc. The constitution does not grant the federal government the authority to regulate it, and as such, I don't want the federal government doing so. If a state's constitution grants the state government the authority to regulate it, have at it at the state level.
All that said, prohibition of ANYTHING has never once in the history of humans worked to prevent the doing of whatever the thing being prohibited is. Government prohibition does nothing to curb the use of that thing, but does create an illegal, violent, profitable market for criminals to engage in the production, transportation, and distribution of said prohibited thing. The crime from that criminal market is ALWAYS more violent and damaging than the thing being prohibited.
I don't understand the thinking of wanting the government to step in and exercise authority over you that it doesn't have, and wanting to create a violent criminal market for something that you and the government will never be able to prevent.
It's borderline mental illness.