This thread was inspired by a recent deal I had cooking here that was compromised due to a misunderstanding concerning a bill of sale for the sale of a firearm from here on the trader.
This made me wonder how the rest of you guys carry out trades/ sells/ purchases and I decided to start this thread.
The buyer said "I don't do bills of sale, I bought a gun here on the trader, went to an Atlanta range where they log serial numbers and then two days later I was arrested for possession of stolen property", he then said the bill of sale was worthless in court and because of that he didn't want to use one anymore. I can see how he could be arrested from signing in at the range, but it doesn't make sense to me because the piece was still stolen and the bill of sale that he had from the previous owner ended up providing a paper trail that he stated "got him out of it". This didn't make sense to me and the more I think about it after he left without the transaction being made the more it doesn't make sense as to why he would not want the bill of sale. Going to the range and logging in the serial number got him busted, the bill of sale got him out of it by providing the paper trail required to show that he bought the firearm, thus getting the authorities in touch with the person he got it from. It appears to me that he would have been a lot worse off if he did not have the bill of sale to prove these things as he would have had a stolen weapon and no way to prove that he didn't steal it.
Something there didn't add up, he left without the firearm and I left him neutral feedback and stated the situation briefly in his feedback queue. He wasn't willing to compromise and neither was I and neither of us stated our thoughts concerning BOS prior to the meeting, so I felt that was a "neutral experience". I now feel that there was an underlying reason why he didn't want the bill of sale as he contradicted himself a couple of times during the meeting and I didn't really notice what he said till I had time to think about it. I can see how the bill of sale would have gotten him in trouble IF he had sold the hot firearm to someone else who took it to the range and logged the serial number and then referenced the paperwork to come back on him, BUT that wasn't the case.
I told him that the bill of sale may not be everything in court if a piece is stolen, but at least it shows due diligence on the behalf of both parties to do the right thing and handle the transaction in a business like manner. I keep a logbook and copies of all bills of sale for what I have, who I got it from, who I sold it to and etc just in case there is ever a situation arise with something I unknowingly bought "hot" or in case I sell a firearm to the next person who intends to single handedly take over the world and uses that weapon, finding me with a knock on the door.
For the life of me I can't see how a bill of sale could lead to a negative experience, it seems to me that it at least provides some form of formality to these transactions.
So what do you guys think? Are there any "rules" to follow concerning the proper way to buy/sell/trade firearms in Georgia? Anyone else feel the same way I do? Anyone feel the same way that the other guy did? Anyone have any examples of how a bill of sale was a pro or a con in a situation where something was "hot" or where something was used in a crime after a private party deal? I'd like to hear thoughts on this.
This made me wonder how the rest of you guys carry out trades/ sells/ purchases and I decided to start this thread.
The buyer said "I don't do bills of sale, I bought a gun here on the trader, went to an Atlanta range where they log serial numbers and then two days later I was arrested for possession of stolen property", he then said the bill of sale was worthless in court and because of that he didn't want to use one anymore. I can see how he could be arrested from signing in at the range, but it doesn't make sense to me because the piece was still stolen and the bill of sale that he had from the previous owner ended up providing a paper trail that he stated "got him out of it". This didn't make sense to me and the more I think about it after he left without the transaction being made the more it doesn't make sense as to why he would not want the bill of sale. Going to the range and logging in the serial number got him busted, the bill of sale got him out of it by providing the paper trail required to show that he bought the firearm, thus getting the authorities in touch with the person he got it from. It appears to me that he would have been a lot worse off if he did not have the bill of sale to prove these things as he would have had a stolen weapon and no way to prove that he didn't steal it.
Something there didn't add up, he left without the firearm and I left him neutral feedback and stated the situation briefly in his feedback queue. He wasn't willing to compromise and neither was I and neither of us stated our thoughts concerning BOS prior to the meeting, so I felt that was a "neutral experience". I now feel that there was an underlying reason why he didn't want the bill of sale as he contradicted himself a couple of times during the meeting and I didn't really notice what he said till I had time to think about it. I can see how the bill of sale would have gotten him in trouble IF he had sold the hot firearm to someone else who took it to the range and logged the serial number and then referenced the paperwork to come back on him, BUT that wasn't the case.
I told him that the bill of sale may not be everything in court if a piece is stolen, but at least it shows due diligence on the behalf of both parties to do the right thing and handle the transaction in a business like manner. I keep a logbook and copies of all bills of sale for what I have, who I got it from, who I sold it to and etc just in case there is ever a situation arise with something I unknowingly bought "hot" or in case I sell a firearm to the next person who intends to single handedly take over the world and uses that weapon, finding me with a knock on the door.
For the life of me I can't see how a bill of sale could lead to a negative experience, it seems to me that it at least provides some form of formality to these transactions.
So what do you guys think? Are there any "rules" to follow concerning the proper way to buy/sell/trade firearms in Georgia? Anyone else feel the same way I do? Anyone feel the same way that the other guy did? Anyone have any examples of how a bill of sale was a pro or a con in a situation where something was "hot" or where something was used in a crime after a private party deal? I'd like to hear thoughts on this.
Last edited: