• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

Thoughts on Marriage.

Do what I do to mine .. elbow the hell out of her then act like YOU'RE asleep 😂 (it works)

Yeah, that’s all fine & good until she figures out what’s happening. Then you’ll be the one waking up to a hard knee to the spine or a smack upside the head at 3:00 in the morning. Don’t ask me how I know this, but I have been married for a long, long time. :pound::boink:
 
They want a man who makes 6 figures and all the luxury items they want but THEY COME PRE-F#CKED & WITH BAGGAGE??!! NAW ... IM GOOD! 😂 👍
You poked the bull now you get the Horns!

  1. Financial and Material Expectations: You're highlighting the idea that some women prioritize a man's high income and ability to provide luxury items. This suggests a perceived transactional nature to the relationship, where the woman's commitment is tied to a certain standard of living.
  2. Past Sexual History and "Baggage": The phrase "PRE-F#CKED & WITH BAGGAGE" is a highly charged and inflammatory way of referring to a woman's past sexual and relationship history (which might include children from previous partners, shared assets, emotional history, etc.). The implication is that a woman's past, particularly her sexual past, somehow devalues her as a partner, especially when combined with high financial expectations.
The core frustration you express is a perceived double standard: you feel that women who expect a partner with a perfect, high-value status (financially) should themselves be 'perfect' (without a past or "baggage").
 
You poked the bull now you get the Horns!

  1. Financial and Material Expectations: You're highlighting the idea that some women prioritize a man's high income and ability to provide luxury items. This suggests a perceived transactional nature to the relationship, where the woman's commitment is tied to a certain standard of living.
  2. Past Sexual History and "Baggage": The phrase "PRE-F#CKED & WITH BAGGAGE" is a highly charged and inflammatory way of referring to a woman's past sexual and relationship history (which might include children from previous partners, shared assets, emotional history, etc.). The implication is that a woman's past, particularly her sexual past, somehow devalues her as a partner, especially when combined with high financial expectations.
The core frustration you express is a perceived double standard: you feel that women who expect a partner with a perfect, high-value status (financially) should themselves be 'perfect' (without a past or "baggage").
im sure I can handle that "bull horn poke".. 😂 You don't like it because I have standards,morals & values?? Wow.. 😂😂 if you want a man with moral and values and structure and discipline then you should have been living that from day 1.. not just discovered you're worth something after 150 guys and 12 baby daddies... Sorry,don't want it ... "MY BODY,MY CHOICE!!" 😂 😂
 
Yeah, that’s all fine & good until she figures out what’s happening. Then you’ll be the one waking up to a hard knee to the spine or a smack upside the head at 3:00 in the morning. Don’t ask me how I know this, but I’ve been married for a long, long time. :pound::boink:
Hasn't happened yet but I'm sure soon enough
 
Watch what ya sayin here there's a liberal in this chat disquised as a Republican!!!! Shhhh....can't say anything bad involving a woman any longer!! 😂 😂
1760987952102.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom