I don't see how this is pertinent when they will themselves be considered firearms if this hypothetical bill passes. [It probably won't]
-
If you are having trouble with your password change please click here for help.
We got ‘til 1am on the HPA/SHORT Act🚨
- Thread starter bd762
- Start date
If suppressors become federally legal July 4th. I would guess AG Carr will declare nolle prosequi until the legislature takes up the issue.
It's never a war crime... The first time!
Here ya go. Could backfire, the whole thing. Might get a new tax rate adjusted for inflation.
www.facebook.com
$3.3 Billion vs $140 Million annually if adjusted for inflation according to her numbers.
675K views · 7.3K reactions | Democrats in the Rules Committee are suggesting that the $200 tax on suppressors should not only be kept in place, but doubled or tripled. Proving that the purpose of tax stamps, and the process involved are intended t
Democrats in the Rules Committee are suggesting that the $200 tax on suppressors should not only be kept in place, but doubled or tripled. Proving that the purpose of tax stamps, and the process...
www.facebook.com
$3.3 Billion vs $140 Million annually if adjusted for inflation according to her numbers.
Here ya go. Could backfire, the whole thing. Might get a new tax rate adjusted for inflation.
675K views · 7.3K reactions | Democrats in the Rules Committee are suggesting that the $200 tax on suppressors should not only be kept in place, but doubled or tripled. Proving that the purpose of tax stamps, and the process involved are intended t
Democrats in the Rules Committee are suggesting that the $200 tax on suppressors should not only be kept in place, but doubled or tripled. Proving that the purpose of tax stamps, and the process...
Is it bad I'm now realizing that they knew this could happen all along and this was the whole point of including it in the bill? Not a total conspiracy theorist, but if it quacks like a duck...
I sure hope I don't need to pick up another suppressor (or two) before this bill passes. When will we know that this is going to be in the bill?
Listened to the video and her saying "We might discourage the sale of silencers and wouldn't that be a good thing" made my skin crawl.
They're all about emotion, doesn't matter that suppressors are rarely if EVER used in criminal activity. That's not the point of course. It's about "control" and revenue. Two things congress cannot get enough of.
Except in movies and mOvIeS rEpReSeNt ReAl LiFe.
Here ya go. Could backfire, the whole thing. Might get a new tax rate adjusted for inflation.
675K views · 7.3K reactions | Democrats in the Rules Committee are suggesting that the $200 tax on suppressors should not only be kept in place, but doubled or tripled. Proving that the purpose of tax stamps, and the process involved are intended t
Democrats in the Rules Committee are suggesting that the $200 tax on suppressors should not only be kept in place, but doubled or tripled. Proving that the purpose of tax stamps, and the process...
$3.3 Billion vs $140 Million annually if adjusted for inflation according to her numbers.
Article says," Democrats say,,,,,", but it sounds like babies and losers to me.
It is time.
|
|
Does SHORT Act remove machine guns, too? Like, does that fall under AOW?
