this was a better example stating a similar scenario by another user and his was easier to understand
"Another scenario, neighbors call police to report a break in across the street. The homeowner is present and has his gun and is in the process of clearing his house when the police arrive. They are outdoor of a glass French door and they see the homeowner with a gun and tac light clearing his house, they yell for him to disarm, wait 1 second and shoot through the glass door. Is it still the homeowners fault? " - Lazarus
the homeowner is not prosecuted for the original reason of the call the cops received
who would be at fault?
this is a hypothetical situation, any event that happen like this in real life have no connection to this question
"Another scenario, neighbors call police to report a break in across the street. The homeowner is present and has his gun and is in the process of clearing his house when the police arrive. They are outdoor of a glass French door and they see the homeowner with a gun and tac light clearing his house, they yell for him to disarm, wait 1 second and shoot through the glass door. Is it still the homeowners fault? " - Lazarus
the homeowner is not prosecuted for the original reason of the call the cops received
who would be at fault?
this is a hypothetical situation, any event that happen like this in real life have no connection to this question
Last edited: