• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

Why is there really no "medium" for Glock's .45?

jcp42877

Default rank <300 posts
Tracker
11   1
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
272
Reaction score
0
Location
Morrow
The G30 frame and G36 frame resemble each other too much for one to be considered a compact and the other a subcomp. Sure the 36 is slimmer and uses "single stack" mags, but the magwell on both guns have that cutout, and rely on the mag baseplate to give you a spot to place your pinky finger.

Im just curious why Glock never designed a 45 with a frame similar to the 19, 23, or 32 that has 3 full finger grooves on it, and flush-er mags.

thoughts?
 
I personally don't really consider the G30 to be "subcompact". The dimensions are pretty damn close to the G19, top-to-bottom and front-to-back. The 30 will of course be thicker.
 
I personally don't really consider the G30 to be "subcompact". The dimensions are pretty damn close to the G19, top-to-bottom and front-to-back. The 30 will of course be thicker.

Well I've owned a 30, a 19, and a 36..and noticed the 30 has the frame of a subcompact, the slide length of a 19, but the slide width of a full size 20 or 21. It's a very odd breed.

i honestly believe the 30S would've been even better had it used a 19-esqe frame, along with the 36's slide width.
 
Every gun shop I go into and ask about the G30s, the employees laugh.....You'd think for Glocks "new handgun for the year" they would have made a couple more of them.
 
Back
Top Bottom