25 years of Glock perfection!!!

[tlw1179]

Your posts are like a fart in a windstorm, I have no idea where your going.

good sig material. . . lol

 

[Chris86]

Sure, you've proved it. Like a person responding with "the bible says"

You sir, are the one that is refusing to accept what people that are very experienced with firearms are telling you, they are trying to help you, but now it is clear that you just want to argue about everything.

You have this idea in your head that you are right and everyone else here is wrong, that's a pretty brave assumption considering you don't know the level of expertise most of these people have with guns.

 

[Fatal_Bert]

really neither. I guess you could call it a LONG double action only. To me its one of those new york lawyer triggers. Made for cops so they dont shoot their own foot.

i was hoping dsp could explain it to us so i could be sure.

 

[Bypass]

Just saying, brother

But, "Let he without sin cast the first stone" has kept my rock chunking days to minimum!

 

[rOmiLaYu]

Smith & Wesson considers the M&P trigger to be a "striker fired double action only" trigger. Is this because once you pull the trigger, it moves forward again and doesn't stay back like Glock's?

No, it's because Glock had already copyrighted "safe-action" and S&W didn't know what to call their plagerized version.

 

[dsp]

Read your own posts.

Your posts are like a fart in a windstorm, I have no idea where your going.

That's because you're selectively copypasting, and therefore doing that renders them senseless.
Now unless you've deleted some of them, to make a point such your claim of my "coarse language directed at someone" WHICH CLEARLY wasn't.

 

[ATLEMT]

No, it's because Glock had already copyrighted "safe-action" and S&W didn't know what to call their plagerized version.

this

 

[rOmiLaYu]

That's because you're selectively copypasting, and therefore doing that renders them senseless.
Now unless you've deleted some of them, to make a point such your claim of my "coarse language directed at someone" WHICH CLEARLY wasn't.

 

[Chris86]

My eyes hurt, but I can't look away!

 

[NWSharpshooter]

That's because you're selectively copypasting, and therefore doing that renders them senseless.
Now unless you've deleted some of them, to make a point such your claim of my "coarse language directed at someone" WHICH CLEARLY wasn't.

There is no selective copy paste to it. I pasted every one of your posts related on this subject directly into that post. I skipped nothing.



Your post that was deleted was deleted for "Typing around the Censor" not for coarse language directed at someone. Do you just make this stuff up as you go along?