"Why can't we have differing, valid opinions without accusations of flawed logic?"First of all, I don't understand why you're making this some type of debate. Why can't we have differing, valid opinions without accusations of flawed logic?
Second, are moderates and undecideds supposed to close their eyes and pretend we don't own 300 million guns in this country? Does them not seeing guns really affect their psyche to that degree? So are you saying that their willingness to uphold or deny our 2nd amendment rights lies potentially in them seeing protestors with or without openly visible firearms at a rally? Hmmm. I'm starting to rethink my flawed logic statement.
Because the actions of a few at a public rally can have negative long term affects on our entire community, so yes, it is up for debate.
"Does them not seeing guns really affect their psyche to that degree?"
You bet your ass it does. Since when has the majority based their opinion on logic, rather than emotion?
