agreedI prefer the F150's. They have their little quirks (little rattles, ticks, etc.) but have always been reliable for me. My 2016 hasn't exactly wowed me, but it hasn't disappointed either. It's fast as hell for a full size truck, gets decent gas mileage for a V8 (around 17+ mpg driving around Atlanta), came pretty well equipped even with a trim below Platinum/King Ranch, and has a **** ton of rear leg room.
I crossed 22,000 miles over the weekend and it already has a few interior rattles/pops when the temp is cold, but that's about it. The rattles seem to go away if the temp is above 50. The only issue I've had was my wipers got stuck on the lowest setting and wouldn't turn off, but I took it over to MOG Ford and they replaced the wiper switch under warranty.
It tows trailers like they're not even there. And the seat bolster is pretty minimal. I went from 150's to BMW's and back to 150's. Mainly because I hate riding so low and the BMW seats give me mild low back pain after hour and hours of driving. I've taken my current 150 to eastern NC, MS, FL (5-6 hours drives) and had no issues with comfort.
I looked at the Tundras, but went with the 150 due to the fact that a comparably equipped Tundra runs about $5,000 more + 7% tax on that extra $5k.
I wouldn't consider a Chevy or a Dodge because the ones I've had have been unreliable, and I'm still pissed about those a-holes taking our tax money for their bailouts.
To add to it, Tundra's and 150's are the only trucks that are fully assembled in the US. I don't care for union labor, but if I'm gonna have to pay $45k+ for a truck, I'd prefer it be one that at least was assembled in the US and not Mexico or Canada.