That is probably so with "new" diesels, but with this, you also get a more complicated emissions and fuel delivery system. One of my vehicles is a 2004 F250 (late build so no real problems). When I first got it, I could run empty at 80mph and get 22-23 mpg on flat ground. When 500ppm "low sulfur" fuel came in, it dropped to 20mpg. Now with "ultra low sulfur" diesel, I am lucky to get 16mpg. Regardless, even after 12 years, the conventional Ford dealers could not reliably repair it the few times it was needed. I had to take it to Powerstroke Specialties in Buford and have it bulletproofed to finally make it reliable. I expect to get another 300k miles out of it. They know what they are doing. I now get 18mpg more or less.The new 3.0 diesel is a VM Motori motor, not the Mercedes. Development was started on the engine in cooperation with GM/Cadillac, but scrapped during the financial meltdown. FCA finished the development for the Ram 1500 and the Jeep GC.
My fear is in the mechanical reliability, including the emissions systems. 2014 models had a lot of problems out of the gate, but over the last couple of years, they seem to have worked it out.
Fuel wise, the diesel gets about 40% more mileage than the Hemi. And to be fair, you have to compare apples to apples, the Hemi requires mid grade gas, which cost the same as diesel on average. Even if you consider regular gas, diesel is only 10% more, so the math actually does work out to an advantage. I like my current 5.7, but with the AWD I get 9-11mpg city, which is most of what I do.