Being he used the references to SCOTUS decisions out of context he probably not a law student. I am doubtful this is a random encounter, the filmer convieniantly forgot to include the beginning. But the courts are reluctant to consider any case brought on by this kind of trolling. If it was a purely random encounter then then guy did OK.Ever notice that no one quotes street encounters or YouTube videos as case law? The courts are where these fights belong, after legaly exercising our rights. Then IF someone's rights are violated then they can be argued where it matters.
