New gun bill sliding right under our nose!!!!!

[Carry_on]

If you guys wanna keep the 2nd amendment alive you guys gotta say no to the bill H.R 3999

This is the beginning of the gun ban people! This isn't a joke.call/email your local senate and express your concerns people!

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/do-not-pass-hr3999

 

[palmettomoon]

We've been yelling about this and beating the hell of the Fudds on this site over this bill for the past week.

 

[Falcon1]

Definitely not new. A few threads when this bill was first introduced, probably not bad to refresh if anyone hasn't seen it though.

 

[Lazarus]

I saw an article somewhere saying this bill is basically already dead, that Paul Ryan isn't going to bring it to the floor for a vote and they want the ATF to regulate the stock under the current NFA laws which according to former ATF director they can't under the current framework. He had a bunch to say including the idea of making the bump fire stocks and binary triggers an amendment to the NFA.

 

[Carry_on]

It grabbed your attention and that was my intentions. We need to act now and not sit back and wait to see what happens.

 

[Plinker66]

The former head of the ATF ain't got the last word.

And what about BATF 2006-2?

 

[Lazarus]

It grabbed your attention and that was my intentions. We need to act now and not sit back and wait to see what happens.

We're pretty diligent when it comes to antigun bills popping up especially after a mass shooting no need to get anyone's attention with old information

 

[Lazarus]

The former head of the ATF ain't got the last word.

And what about BATF 2006-2?

Never said he did. Those comments where from an article whose main focus was ATF vs NRA. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out.

What about 2006-2?

 

[Plinker66]

Does BATF 2006-2 exercise jurisdiction over a resetting-trigger speed-em-up device?

If the NFA applies to one resetting-trigger speed-em-up device, does the NFA apply to all the resetting-trigger type speed-em-up devices?

 

[Lazarus]

Does BATF 2006-2 exercise jurisdiction over a resetting-trigger speed-em-up device?

If the NFA applies to one resetting-trigger speed-em-up device, does the NFA apply to all the resetting-trigger type speed-em-up devices?

There was talk that the SFS (Bump stock) should have been covered under 2006-2 but it wasn't. Doesn't mean they can't reverse it I guess since they did it to the Akins Accelerator. The difference between the SFS and the Accelerator though is the lack of any type of springs. Just my theory as to why it isn't covered. Also can't you lock the SFS to make it a fixed stock?