• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

New Law Counters Westboro Protests

chopper duke

Default rank 5000+ posts
The Hen that laid the Golden Legos
205   0
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
9,585
Reaction score
1,833
Location
Loganville, GA
Just got this in an email form Military.com:
http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/08/06/new-law-counters-westboro-protests/

Congress took action where the Supreme Court didn’t to curb Westbooro Baptist Church’s followers from protesting the funerals of fallen troops and veterans.

President Obama signed into law Monday the Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act that includes language aimed at protecting service members funerals. The church based in Kansas is best known for staging protests at service members funerals to protest the service of homosexuals in the military.

In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled the First Amendment protected Westboro’s right to protest the funerals. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion that “as a nation we have chosen … to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate.”


Sen. Olympia Snow, R-Maine, introduced legislation three months following the Court’s ruling that gives the government the right to further protect the funerals. The act argues that ensuring fallen troops have respectful burials is important to maintaining a strong military and protecting national security.

The new law extends bans on picketing funeral services of troops and veterans from 150 feet to 300 feet, and prohibits protests from being conducted up to two hours before and after a funeral. Previously the ban was for an hour before and after.

Violations are punishable by a fine and up to a year in jail.

“The graves of our veterans are hallowed ground, and obviously we all defend our Constitution and the First Amendment and free speech,” Obama said at the White House ceremony Monday. “But we also believe that when men and women die in the service of their country and are laid to rest, it should be done with the utmost honor and respect.”

The other half of the law dictates the medical care for the thousands of service members and families afflicted with illnesses from ingesting contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, N.C. between 1957 and 1987. Read more here about the fight families have sustained for Congress to acknowledge the effect the water has had on up to one million troops and their family members.

– Bryant Jordan
 
While I agree with the sentiment and principal , any law to infringe on our Constitutional rights can only lead to bad things . Especially when invoking ''national security '' . Between national security and the Patriot Act our rights are being flushed rapidly .

Perhaps a better way to deal with this could be based on trespassing laws . If you aren't directly involved and invited to a funeral , you would be guilty of criminal trespass .
 
Tell you what I'd like to see, someone with a automatic paintball gun open up om them at a protest. Pleads not guilty and see what a grand jury says about It.
 
I'd like the vid where the bikers lined up in front of those sorry dip****s and hammered them with some good ol V-Twin counter-protest.
 
Tell you what I'd like to see, someone with a automatic paintball gun open up om them at a protest. Pleads not guilty and see what a grand jury says about It.

Yes, because violence against people exercising their Constitutional rights is acceptable as long as you don't approve of the way in which they are exercising those rights.
 
Back
Top Bottom