Ohio man gets jail for mocking disabled girl

[sovietak474u]

The guy deserves an ass whooping for sure. But I disagree with the jail time. I think it sets a dangerous standard. I disagree with the disorderly conduct law because I don't like vague "catch all" type laws.

I can see this leading to parents of handicapped children using this kind of thing to get people arrested so they can sue to make money off of it even of there is no emotional damage done to the insulted person.

I can agree with this. Disorderly conduct is a catch all law.

 

[Corso]

Am going to go with the bible....

And so in your logic... I call you a dumb butt and I should go to jail?

P.s. mom has C.P. and I was a fatty in school...I know bullying first hand....

Don't make a law... make an education .....

Dumb butt is harmless if talking to an adult but let's go deeper.If you call me a MF"er in front of my child or yours then yes you should and will in the state of GA and most other states also.

 

[19 Kilo]

Am going to go with the bible....

And so in your logic... I call you a dumb butt and I should go to jail?

P.s. mom has C.P. and I was a fatty in school...I know bullying first hand....

Don't make a law... make an education .....

Best post here.

 

[Fatal_Bert]

i been charged with disorderly conduct twice, one was $85fine the other was $200fine, no arrest or jail time. I could understand a cop writing him a ticket, but arrest and jail time is just as stupid as his actions. fwiw i hope he gets shived while he's locked up.

 

[Corso]

i been charged with disorderly conduct twice, one was $85fine the other was $200fine, no arrest or jail time. I could understand a cop writing him a ticket, but arrest and jail time is just as stupid as his actions. fwiw i hope he gets shived while he's locked up.

I have seen people go to jail over a tag light...In GA if they can write you a ticket you can be arrested for it.

 

[EugenFJR]

This says it all. So YES you giving the finger can have you charged with disorderly conduct

2917.11 Disorderly conduct.

(A) No person shall recklessly cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to another by doing any of the following:
(1) Engaging in fighting, in threatening harm to persons or property, or in violent or turbulent behavior;
(2) Making unreasonable noise or an offensively coarse utterance, gesture, or display or communicating unwarranted and grossly abusive language to any person;
(3) Insulting, taunting, or challenging another, under circumstances in which that conduct is likely to provoke a violent response;
(4) Hindering or preventing the movement of persons on a public street, road, highway, or right-of-way, or to, from, within, or upon public or private property, so as to interfere with the rights of others, and by any act that serves no lawful and reasonable purpose of the offender;
(5) Creating a condition that is physically offensive to persons or that presents a risk of physical harm to persons or property, by any act that serves no lawful and reasonable purpose of the offender.
(B) No person, while voluntarily intoxicated, shall do either of the following:
(1) In a public place or in the presence of two or more persons, engage in conduct likely to be offensive or to cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to persons of ordinary sensibilities, which conduct the offender, if the offender were not intoxicated, should know is likely to have that effect on others;
(2) Engage in conduct or create a condition that presents a risk of physical harm to the offender or another, or to the property of another.
(C) Violation of any statute or ordinance of which an element is operating a motor vehicle, locomotive, watercraft, aircraft, or other vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or any drug of abuse, is not a violation of division (B) of this section. (D) If a person appears to an ordinary observer to be intoxicated, it is probable cause to believe that person is voluntarily intoxicated for purposes of division (B) of this section.
(E)(1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of disorderly conduct.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in division (E)(3) of this section, disorderly conduct is a minor misdemeanor.
(3) Disorderly conduct is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree if any of the following applies:
(a) The offender persists in disorderly conduct after reasonable warning or request to desist.
(b) The offense is committed in the vicinity of a school or in a school safety zone.
(c) The offense is committed in the presence of any law enforcement officer, firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services person, or other authorized person who is engaged in the person’s duties at the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any kind. (d) The offense is committed in the presence of any emergency facility person who is engaged in the person’s duties in an emergency facility.
(F) As used in this section:
(1) “Emergency medical services person” is the singular of “emergency medical services personnel” as defined in section 2133.21 of the Revised Code.
(2) “Emergency facility person” is the singular of “emergency facility personnel” as defined in section 2909.04 of the Revised Code.
(3) “Emergency facility” has the same meaning as in section 2909.04 of the Revised Code.
(4) “Committed in the vicinity of a school” has the same meaning as in section 2925.01 of the Revised Code.

If FL has the same law as Ga, Then the guy who shot the kid who got pissed off for him asking to turn down there music should get off scott free... Its clear that they were acting in a disorderly way and going to do him harm....

 

[Fatal_Bert]

I have seen people go to jail over a tag light...In GA if they can write you a ticket you can be arrested for it.

good for you, but just cause you've seen something before or cause it's written in law doesn't mean it's right or that i have to agree with it.

 

[Corso]

good for you, but just cause you've seen something before or cause it's written in law doesn't mean it's right or that i have to agree with it.

It's not my opinion it's the law and I seen it in action first hand, so yeah.

 

[Corso]

If FL has the same law as Ga, Then the guy who shot the kid who got pissed off for him asking to turn down there music should get off scott free... Its clear that they were acting in a disorderly way and going to do him harm....

Really???

Running up to someone in their face and calling the MF'r and ranting is threatening , someone playing loud music isn't threatening....Wow some peoples logic.

 

[Fatal_Bert]

It's not my opinion it's the law and I seen it in action first hand, so yeah.

didn't say it was your opinion, didn't say it wasn't the law, didn't say you hadn't seen it, just said that despite the law or what you've seen doesn't make it right or that i have to agree with it, reading through this thread it's obvious that you don't get that, so i just leave at everyone agrees that he deserves an ass whoopin.