Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well heres my experience with rip, there may have possibly been a dog that tore into my chicken pen this am. It may have killed all my chickens and I may or may not have shot it with my 42 with rip in it. If this did actually happen, which I'm not saying did, I was impressed with the round. Just saying for all the peta and d- bag animal liberals. Now if I had my g30 in my hand I woulda been more impressed but it was what I had at the time, maybe.
So, you're not familiar with the interweb?I don't get the bashing or praise from anyone that has not shot the stuff or why anyone would get into a heated argument over it.
Yeah, thing is you could've used an $.08 .22lr to accomplish the same thing, and used the remaining $69.92 to buy new chickens.
Yeah, thing is you could've used an $.08 .22lr to accomplish the same thing, and used the remaining $69.92 to buy new chickens.
We're planning a few test with this stuff to see how well it does. I'll post up what we see as soon as I get finished with it.
I'll hold my comments about the RIP ammo's performance until I see what it does and how well it works for myself. I have seen (in person, not on youtube) tons of tests in ballistic gel with the 380. The results are always the same, the rear of the bullet penetrates 7 1/2" to 8" deep and the "petals" expand to a 5" circle penetrating 5 1/2" to 6" deep.
I don't get the bashing or praise from anyone that has not shot the stuff or why anyone would get into a heated argument over it.
Ballistics gel or the clear gelatin?