-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
SB Tactical announces reversal ATF open letter on pistol stabilizing brace
- Thread starter cmshoot
- Start date
Murky waters.
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2014
- Messages
- 15,502
- Reaction score
- 15,723
- Location
- Metro Atlanta - Buford to Buckhead
That is still the correct way to do and waaay more useful.
Exactly! That's what started all this in the first place.
I'm thinking that ATF's intent here is to force the manufacturers of these devices to ONLY market them to the public as braces for extended-arm shooting, BUT..
... once you buy one, YOU, the customer, can choose to stick it on your shoulder if you like.
Just don't brag about having a tax-free transferable SBR that ATF doesn't know about.
Just don't encourage others to exploit this loophole.
And gun stores, distributors, and manufacturers should not market and promote arm braces as substitutes for shoulder stocks.
(It's kinda like the "don't ask, don't tell" thing for gays in the military years ago).
... once you buy one, YOU, the customer, can choose to stick it on your shoulder if you like.
Just don't brag about having a tax-free transferable SBR that ATF doesn't know about.
Just don't encourage others to exploit this loophole.
And gun stores, distributors, and manufacturers should not market and promote arm braces as substitutes for shoulder stocks.
(It's kinda like the "don't ask, don't tell" thing for gays in the military years ago).
Right there with you brother
They really should just do away with the NFA all together.
