#metoo
-
If you are having trouble with your password change please click here for help.
Status of Bump Stocks
- Thread starter Lumberman
- Start date
Please shower separately... I am getting a very bad visual....
we could shower together with one bar of soap and still be less gay than some of these post.
Jury is out on that one.....
That’s great!
And thanks for sharing!
I’m a Missouri Resident and didn’t know any of that.
Because there is no Constitutional right to be an illegal alien, whereas there is this little thing called 2A... Absolutely no comparison there.
So you'd rather the president be a dictator and make his own laws as opposed to Congress doing it's job because something bad might happen.
Curious if you could point me in the direction of the law book where one can learn more about this type of legal mumbo jumbo...
Like I said, you probably like when the POTUS uses EO to do things that you like, but then cry foul when he uses it for something that you don't.
The point is, a local or state jurisdiction refusing to comply with Federal law on both cases, I think is a little hypocritical to say that one is ok but the other is not. Again, based largely on which one you agree with.
And I didn't say that I thought Trump was RIGHT. I said I am surprised this hasn't happened sooner, or that they were allowed at all, considering how strict they are about NFA stuff like full auto weapons.
In terms of practical usage, the bump stock IS a device that converts a semi auto into a full auto. It just is. Argue about how it accomplishes it all day long, it doesn't change anything. It was a dubious work around that skirted the law, and probably shouldn't have been on the market to begin with.
Get rid of the NFA and all this goes away and you can shoot whatever you want. Problem solved.
Even if you are technically right, the defense of the bump stock is VERY thin... Even the NRA realized this and decided it wasn't the battle they wished to fight.
The point is, a local or state jurisdiction refusing to comply with Federal law on both cases, I think is a little hypocritical to say that one is ok but the other is not. Again, based largely on which one you agree with.
And I didn't say that I thought Trump was RIGHT. I said I am surprised this hasn't happened sooner, or that they were allowed at all, considering how strict they are about NFA stuff like full auto weapons.
In terms of practical usage, the bump stock IS a device that converts a semi auto into a full auto. It just is. Argue about how it accomplishes it all day long, it doesn't change anything. It was a dubious work around that skirted the law, and probably shouldn't have been on the market to begin with.
Get rid of the NFA and all this goes away and you can shoot whatever you want. Problem solved.
Even if you are technically right, the defense of the bump stock is VERY thin... Even the NRA realized this and decided it wasn't the battle they wished to fight.
And just crossing the news wire! SCOTUS refuses to consider bid to reverse ban on bump stocks. Even with a pro-gun Conservative majority, they didn't feel this was worth pursuing...
No matter how many times you say a bump stock converts a semi auto into a full auto, it still doesn't make it true. Words, definitions, and laws matter.
And if the day comes when leftists gain complete control and they want to ban all semi-autos via EO because you can pull the trigger to fast thus "converting a semi auto into a full auto," we'll see just how "hypocritical" you are...
There is no pro gun conservative majority on the SC. There are at most 3 pro-gun justices on that court. Neither Roberts or Kavanaugh are pro-gun or conservative, or would even know the Constitution if it slapped them upside their cuckservative heads...
