The 460 Rowland conversion.

[AirOpsMgr]

Are you going to stick with the GI sights or go adjustable?

 

[militaryrednek]

First thing in the morning. At two dollars a shot I probably won't do much more than a function check with a few mags.

ouch! that hurts my wallet just thinking about that lol!

 

[Bypass]

Are you going to stick with the GI sights or go adjustable?

Honestly I really like GI 1911s even more than a lot of souped up models including the TRP I have. So I am pretty happy I can keep this thing pretty base and light. The lighter the better IMHO. I don't really need match sights. It is only a pistol after all.

 

[Hayata]

ouch! that hurts my wallet just thinking about that lol!

Well, ya know, with the .460 there's no need for a double-tap, so there's a savings right there!

 

[Bypass]

ouch! that hurts my wallet just thinking about that lol!

Yeah I agree. But if I have to use it then it will have been worth every penny.

 

[Hayata]

Well bad news and some good news. The 460 rowland conversion didn't drop into my Springfield TRP. The good news it dropped in just fine to my Colt series 80 MKIV government model.

View attachment 293804View attachment 293805

That is really DEAD SEXY looking!

 

[AirOpsMgr]

Honestly I really like GI 1911s even more than a lot of souped up models including the TRP I have. So I am pretty happy I can keep this thing pretty base and light. The lighter the better IMHO. I don't really need match sights. It is only a pistol after all.

I gotcha, I was just wondering if adujstables would be needed for the 460 vs POI from the .45

 

[Bypass]

Well, ya know, with the .460 there's no need for a double-tap, so there's a savings right there!

Ha ha,

 

[Bypass]

I gotcha, I was just wondering if adujstables would be needed for the 460 vs POI from the .45

That is a interesting question. I never considered a POI change on this thing.

 

[Hayata]

I'm thinking with the increased recoil how a beaver tail would really help.

Just thinking out loud.