You only get energy out if you put it in. I was going to say that what you're proposing is effectively 'perpetual motion', and then you explicitly propose that might be one solution.
Hybrids use technologies such as regenerative braking already. If you gather energy from 'wind' when you're driving, unless a wind is blowing from the same direction the car is moving (and it'll have to be moving faster than the car) you won't gain any energy, and in order to catch the wind, you'll need to ADD to the wind resistance of the vehicle.
There is NO such thing as a free lunch. Especially with energy. If you want to move an object weighing several thousand pounds around, you need a reliable, energy-dense SOURCE. Batteries are not a source. They're a storage medium. They have to have energy put back into them (and quickly enough that the vehicle can get you to where you want to go in a relatively short timeframe).
Energy density and consistency of supply are vital, and all the woo-woo wind, solar, bacterial, unicorn-fart technologies being proposed to provide it are not able to do it.
Furthermore, when one form of energy (electrical, gasoline, gravity etc) is converted into another (kinetic - i.e. vehicle movement) - there are always energy losses. And always will be until someone manages to overthrow the law of conservation of energy. Some of those losses you WANT (i.e. you can't get traction to the road surface without friction. Friction creates heat - an energy loss from the car's "closed system").
Sorry to break it to you, but "Perpetual Motion" ain't going to be a solution. You'll have to find the energy somewhere else to drive that alternator.
Hybrids use technologies such as regenerative braking already. If you gather energy from 'wind' when you're driving, unless a wind is blowing from the same direction the car is moving (and it'll have to be moving faster than the car) you won't gain any energy, and in order to catch the wind, you'll need to ADD to the wind resistance of the vehicle.
There is NO such thing as a free lunch. Especially with energy. If you want to move an object weighing several thousand pounds around, you need a reliable, energy-dense SOURCE. Batteries are not a source. They're a storage medium. They have to have energy put back into them (and quickly enough that the vehicle can get you to where you want to go in a relatively short timeframe).
Energy density and consistency of supply are vital, and all the woo-woo wind, solar, bacterial, unicorn-fart technologies being proposed to provide it are not able to do it.
Furthermore, when one form of energy (electrical, gasoline, gravity etc) is converted into another (kinetic - i.e. vehicle movement) - there are always energy losses. And always will be until someone manages to overthrow the law of conservation of energy. Some of those losses you WANT (i.e. you can't get traction to the road surface without friction. Friction creates heat - an energy loss from the car's "closed system").
Sorry to break it to you, but "Perpetual Motion" ain't going to be a solution. You'll have to find the energy somewhere else to drive that alternator.