• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

What are some unpopular gun opinions you have?

If someone can not be trusted to not hurt others with a firearm, then why is that person walking around, free?

If someone has committed a crime, and they have served their time and been released with no probabtion or parole, then that person is free and should be able to own firearms.

If someone has mental health issues and will use a gun to hurt someone, why is that person walking around free?
 
If someone has committed a crime, and they have served their time and been released with no probabtion or parole, then that person is free and should be able to own firearms.

Same line of thinking: A kid diddler that finished his time should be legally able to work in a day care or school because he did his time.

Food for thought.
 
What part of “shall not be infringed” did you not understand?

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of time press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..."
Samuel Adams
(didn't see that coming, didja?)




If someone has mental health issues and will use a gun to hurt someone, why is that person walking around free?
People that are clearly NOT "peaceable citizens", or that are clearly not in their right mind, have no business walking around with a pistol under their shirt. And it simply isn't economically or logistically (or even legally) feasible that we indefinitely lock away every nut case in existence, or that we incarcerate career violent criminals, for longer than their sentence mandated.
Welcome to the real world.
 
People that are clearly NOT "peaceable citizens", or that are clearly not in their right mind, have no business walking around with a pistol under their blah, blah, blah...

Again, what ole Sam Adams said afterwards is opinion. The 2nd amendment contains some of the strongest language in the Constitution, “Shall not be infringed.”

And someone who has served their time and has been released with no parole or probation is square with the house. They have paid their debt.
 
If someone can not be trusted to not hurt others with a firearm, then why is that person walking around, free?

If someone has committed a crime, and they have served their time and been released with no probabtion or parole, then that person is free and should be able to own firearms.

If someone has mental health issues and will use a gun to hurt someone, why is that person walking around free?
so your fine with taking ALL of someones freedom and liberty but not just 1 aspect of it. yea that makes sense
 
Back
Top Bottom