So kids can have guns? Non-USA citizens and criminals as well?What part of “shall not be infringed” did you not understand?
I see no problems here /sarcasm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So kids can have guns? Non-USA citizens and criminals as well?What part of “shall not be infringed” did you not understand?
Again, what part of “shall not be infringed” did you not understand?So kids can have guns? Non-USA citizens and criminals as well?
I see no problems here /sarcasm
If someone has committed a crime, and they have served their time and been released with no probabtion or parole, then that person is free and should be able to own firearms.
Kid diddling is not protected by the Constitution.Same line of thinking: A kid diddler that finished his time should be legally able to work in a day care or school because he did his time.
Food for thought.
What part of “shall not be infringed” did you not understand?
People that are clearly NOT "peaceable citizens", or that are clearly not in their right mind, have no business walking around with a pistol under their shirt. And it simply isn't economically or logistically (or even legally) feasible that we indefinitely lock away every nut case in existence, or that we incarcerate career violent criminals, for longer than their sentence mandated.If someone has mental health issues and will use a gun to hurt someone, why is that person walking around free?
People that are clearly NOT "peaceable citizens", or that are clearly not in their right mind, have no business walking around with a pistol under their blah, blah, blah...
so your saying you under no circumstances should lose your right to bear arms?What part of “shall not be infringed” did you not understand?
so your fine with taking ALL of someones freedom and liberty but not just 1 aspect of it. yea that makes senseIf someone can not be trusted to not hurt others with a firearm, then why is that person walking around, free?
If someone has committed a crime, and they have served their time and been released with no probabtion or parole, then that person is free and should be able to own firearms.
If someone has mental health issues and will use a gun to hurt someone, why is that person walking around free?