So who thinks that under the GA hunting regs a gun is "loaded" if the magazine is out of it, but that magazine, not attached to the gun in any way, but just kept nearby, is itself loaded?
A loaded magazine does not make for a loaded gun , unless the magazine is IN the gun.
Duh. Does anybody doubt that's how the law is supposed to be applied? Isn't it perfectly clear that's what they meant, and any other construction of those words would be absurd, ridiculous?
A loaded magazine does not make for a loaded gun , unless the magazine is IN the gun.
Duh. Does anybody doubt that's how the law is supposed to be applied? Isn't it perfectly clear that's what they meant, and any other construction of those words would be absurd, ridiculous?