This is why I said I hate to even get involved.
-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
Wow! With an open mind watch these videos. Landed on the moon or a huge fake and no country has ever landed on the moon?
- Thread starter testdepth
- Start date
I cant believe you're serious.
The sun is 90 million miles away. If the sun and moon are in the same area, viewing from earth, they would be 4" apart but the sun is 90 million miles behind the moon and would only light up the "dark side of the moon"
and there would be zero light emitting from the side facing the earth.
You can back the moon up over 30% and let's go for a million miles, nothing would change.
I've seen stars through the center of the moon on occasions with telescopes and binoculars. No amount of elliptical mumbo jumbo trumps what is easily viewed.
Do you believe moonlight (regardless of the nature/source of that light) reaches the earth ? In other words, when the moon is out and bright, your eyes have better light for seeing things, in comparison to a moonless light?
See
rbstern
's post immediately below. No votes with moon landings. No gold on the moon. Human costs of accidents could destroy NASA, or at least cut its budget more. People just don't care; unless the krapdashians or Taylor swift told them to.Theory of Relativity. With low gravity and matching speeds the overall speed isn't as important. Like refueling a jet or chinook in air.
When the moon is truly between the earth and sun you get an eclipse. But since the moon is moving the eclipse is not "global" and follows a path, like any other satellite.
I understand. I don't want to be that guy. Wait until someone explains the new moon phase when you can't see it with any amount of sunlight.
One has an elliptical orbit at thousands of miles an hour and one shoots straight up off the moon with no way to control the craft. lolSee
Theory of Relativity. With low gravity and matching speeds the overall speed isn't as important. Like refueling a jet or chinook in air.
All with 1960 tech.
NASA stopped because they couldn't fake it any longer. It's why all the original tech, photos and everything else is gone. Yet, "They would go back in a nano second."
The moon emits its own light, yes. That light is also cold when measured from earth compared to not being in the moon light. Opposite of the sun where you would be hotter in the shade.
Dafuq we get here?
Are you even vaguely familiar with Newton's laws of motion?
Specifically and practically: You aim a nozzle with gas coming out of it in one direction. You go in the opposite direction.
Put enough of those nozzles on a craft, with controls inside the craft to manage those thrusts, along with measurement tools that can read acceleration forces, and guess what? You can controllably propel that craft in any direction you like, within the constraints of mass, gravity, drag, and fuel availability. And since there is no drag from atmosphere on and around the moon, the acceleration does not degrade.
Add either radar/and or a simple computer that knows the position, speed and direction of the object you are trying to intercept, and the craft can tell you which way to steer.
Starting from 0, if you accelerate at at 1 meter per second squared, you'll be going the same speed as the lunar module in orbit in about 25 minutes. That's way under 1g of acceleration. You'd barely feel it.
From a physics perspective, you're trying to discredit one of the less challenging aspects of the entire space mission. The low gravity, low weight, and lack of atmosphere aid greatly in simplifying the lander ascent.
