A 22 may actually be worse than nothing at all. If you think a 22 will stop an attack you are less likely to run the f**k away, which is a better survival strategy than sticking around when all you have is a 22.
Exactly. I agree 100%!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A 22 may actually be worse than nothing at all. If you think a 22 will stop an attack you are less likely to run the f**k away, which is a better survival strategy than sticking around when all you have is a 22.
I like mine in the house for the fact that I have 50 rounds (2 "CLIPS") ready to go if needed for short or long distance. Easy gun for the wife and 10yo son to shoot if I am not around. I was talking to a LEO, he told me the 22 round scares him more than 9mm., vest penetration wise.
I will make the same challenge here that I have made to over 1000 firearms instructors.
Give me ONE example of a PRIVATE CITIZEN who was injured or killed after shooting their attacker with a .22. I have hundreds of examples of incidents where .22s worked just fine. Incidents involving law enforcement trying to take a criminal into custody or military personnel shooting fanatical savages overseas are NOT germane to this research.
I'm waiting.
Shock and the fear of "oh god im shot," is what makes this possible. If I have 1-10 holes in me no matter the size im dying or getting the hell out
running away just lets the bad guy shoot you in the back instead of the chest. Either way... I am taking the gun I have closest to me at the time.. dumping the mag or die trying