Yep, that's what I'm talking about......Yep like 300 blackout the whisper been around years prior.then everyone went ape**** over the 6.5 creedmore the 260 been around years.they built the 280 to compete with 7 mag.basically a sales gimmick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, that's what I'm talking about......Yep like 300 blackout the whisper been around years prior.then everyone went ape**** over the 6.5 creedmore the 260 been around years.they built the 280 to compete with 7 mag.basically a sales gimmick.
There is somethin to be said about being comfortable with what you shoot.I shot a friends 7 PRC and the recoil is brutal. It's basically a 7 mm magnum on steroids. I can't imagine the 300 PRC because it's hit harder than the 300 Win Mag. Unless you plan on hunting moose or grizzly bear I would think the 300 PRC would be way too much gun. Considering the fact you can kill a deer with a 223 a 300 win Mag is too much gun I think. I just don't understand all that firepower to bring down a deer.
Initially I was going to build a 7 PRC. But a few of the members here talk me out of it because of the recoil and how it wouldn't be enjoyable to shoot. My hat's off to them cuz they were correct. It would not be a gun I'd want to shoot at the range very often and would have been a wasted build. The 6.5 PRC is a perfect combination of power accuracy and mild recoil. It hits just a little harder than a 6.5 Creedmoor and nowhere near 30-06. And the 30-06 recoil is milder than the 7 PRC or the 300 PRC. So that pretty much rules out any range work.
One of my lifelong friends Tony took a deer at 680 yards with 6.5 PRC. He has one of the Bergara highline rifles with the Trijicon scope. He bought one of those Kenton industries BDC turret tapes. He just lazed the distance and dialed it in on the turret and the deer dropped like a sack of wet clams. That should give you an idea of the power and accuracy of that round.
Well the thing about hand loading, you can tailor it to your needsThe gun I shot was a light weight hunting rig. That SOB like to ripped my shoulder off! Pleasant hell! LOL it might have been a lot better if it had a muzzle break on it but this one didn't.
Certainly worth somethin to youMy 6.5 PRC.. Howa barreled action in a Boyd's AT ONE stock and a Athlon. 6-24×56 illuminated scope. The scope list for around 700 but a member hooked me up with a insane low price. The whole combo is a joy to shoot. I have only stretched it out to 350 yards but it hits what I aim at so I am completely satisfied with it. So satisfied I am looking at getting a second rifle in 6.5 PRC. Definitely my favorite cartridge to date.
View attachment 9041477View attachment 9041480
No doubt that it is a good cartridge, but does it fit your needs and use? Take a highly efficient caliber projectile, push higher grain weight and even higher BC projectiles faster, and it's a recipe for success.I posted the same question on Long Range Hunting forum. Got a very different response and conversation.View attachment 9061482
I posted the same question on Long Range Hunting forum. Got a very different response and conversation.View attachment 9061482
Lol, what? 7 PRC is a sweetheart. I built one that weighs just a touch over 8lbs 10 ounces and it has virtually no recoil. It's a dream to shoot. If 7 PRC was short action I wouldn't even own 6.5CM.I shot a friends 7 PRC and the recoil is brutal. It's basically a 7 mm magnum on steroids. I can't imagine the 300 PRC because it's hit harder than the 300 Win Mag. Unless you plan on hunting moose or grizzly bear I would think the 300 PRC would be way too much gun. Considering the fact you can kill a deer with a 223 a 300 win Mag is too much gun I think. I just don't understand all that firepower to bring down a deer.
Initially I was going to build a 7 PRC. But a few of the members here talk me out of it because of the recoil and how it wouldn't be enjoyable to shoot. My hat's off to them cuz they were correct. It would not be a gun I'd want to shoot at the range very often and would have been a wasted build. The 6.5 PRC is a perfect combination of power accuracy and mild recoil. It hits just a little harder than a 6.5 Creedmoor and nowhere near 30-06. And the 30-06 recoil is milder than the 7 PRC or the 300 PRC. So that pretty much rules out any range work.
I think you are looking at this the wrong way. Where 6.5 PRC fits in your case is you just throw out all those other calibers and just run the 6.5PRC. it's your perfect consolidation caliber.I have 6.5 CM, 25-06, 280ai, 270 WSM.
Not sure a 6.5 PRC warrants an addition to what I already have.
I guess it has a lot to do with the set up. The one I shot was a light weight hunting set up. I would guess around 5.5 lbs. I am not opposed to a 7 PRC if set up right. My 6.5 PRC shoots really well but it's a tad on the heavy side. I am actually thinking of changing out the #6 contour barrel out for a Carbon Six barrel of equal diameter to fit my stock right and cut weight. I might not even be opposed converting to a 7 PRC since my 6.5 PRC is a long action. Nothing wrong with a little more ass behind the projectile. 😁 I do like the 6.5 PRC though. It will get the job done and do it with little recoil.Lol, what? 7 PRC is a sweetheart. I built one that weighs just a touch over 8lbs 10 ounces and it has virtually no recoil. It's a dream to shoot. If 7 PRC was short action I wouldn't even own 6.5CM.
View attachment 9069648
View attachment 9069649
As for the OPs question,
I think you are looking at this the wrong way. Where 6.5 PRC fits in your case is you just throw out all those other calibers and just run the 6.5PRC. it's your perfect consolidation caliber.