In full disclosure, I allowed myself to be sucked into the arguments and was immediately labeled a LEO basher and a troll. Shame on me. As for the dog thread, I was sickened by the whole event and my position was the outcome could have been prevented if the officers had acted better. Other LEO's disagreed and the race was on. I did not buy into the view that the dogs life is more valuable, it is not, but I do hold LEO to a higher standard than some loudmouth antagonizing idiot and would have hoped a little situational awareness and good judgment on the LEO's part would have prevented them from killing the dog. My career training taught me an outcome is never the result of any one event, it is the result of cumulative actions, thus the reasoning behind my remarks. In my humble opinion, placing the blame entirely on the idiot owner is a myopic view of the events that led to the end result and watching that dog die needlessly was disturbing to say the least.
What initially got me fired up in this thread was the nonchalant attitude that because the charges against the girls were dropped, no harm, no foul. I say plenty of foul. So much foul in fact, that I took a couple of hours and researched why all the animosity against police and vice versa as I truly had no idea this existed at the level I witnessed here the past few days. For a forum that is based on a common interest to be so deeply divided on what should have been nothing more than a casual discussion is quite telling. In summary, Houston, we have a problem.
In conclusion, if every LEO had your outlook, we would not be having these discussions. I for one, sincerely appreciate you speaking up and for your service to the community. Thank you for all you do.
I agree whole heartedly, that Dog Thread was very disturbing and the biggest tragedy, despite all the dumbassery on both sides, was watching that dog die! Watching that makes me want to line both the owner and shooter against a wall and kick them both in the balls as hard as I could. All the other variables aside, the owner should have secured his dog AND the officer should have used more restraint.
I, like any sane man, do not want to get bit by a dog. However, before I chose to kill him, I would have had to have more than that dog was displaying. Perception of threat to some extent is an individual thing. What I mean is that what I might find as not so alarming (i.e. the dog lunging) another officer my perceive as life threatening and react accordingly. BUT, and this is the bright line of reasonableness that many of my fellow LEOs will not see or agree with, there was no immediate threat to that officer's life and unless that officer was so new that he had zero experience with dogs, he should have known that his pistol was not the best option.
So, you see, you and I actually agree on many of the same points here. Even though you are a "LEO Basher" and I am a "Jack Booted Thug", we still find a way to meet on common ground when we are willing to see truth without bias and admit the none of us have a corner on what is right.
Last edited: