Federal Judge Rules AR-15's Are "Dangerous and Unusual," Not Protected by 2nd Amendment

[SchmittZoid]

The scariest thing in this article is the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT by our judicial representative charged to defend the same constitution she/he/it is desecrating.

I thought the presumption of innocence was the law of the land . . . .

Dangerous times . . . .

 

[albatros43]

The language in that article was very strange. Why was it incumbent upon the Pro 2A guys to prove that ARs and AKs can be used legitimately for self defense, as if that matters....

 

[GlockIssue]

Yea, that is how I was reading it as well.

And it continues on...

 

[blackbeard]

So what does this ruling mean? Does it affect gun ownership in Maryland or is it just this judge's opinion?

sounds like an opinion but its a very dangerous one.

 

[Gigabyte71]

View attachment 302767

The scariest thing in this article is the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT by our judicial representative charged to defend the same constitution she/he/it is desecrating.

I thought the presumption of innocence was the law of the land . . . .

Dangerous times . . . .

Really? Then why do those awaiting trial get to wait in prison, if they can't afford to bail out?

I think the fact that this judge things the 2nd is about self-defense.

 

[erkinator]

Everybody sing along.....a him or a her, a Madame or sir? It's Pat....

Its called a Shim

 

[Fisher7]

The bad thing is that he/she/it breeds

 

[Tylerls1]

The bad thing is that he/she/it breeds

You mean adopt?

 

[ShawnZR-1]

View attachment 302767

The scariest thing in this article is the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT by our judicial representative charged to defend the same constitution she/he/it is desecrating.

I thought the presumption of innocence was the law of the land . . . .

Dangerous times . . . .

Where do these judges get their education from?! The 2A says absolutely NOTHING about self defense and all of the primary writings of the day explicitly state that the 2A was put in to keep the .gov in check. It's the final check in 'check and balances'. Just because judges have f'd up and ruled on a myriad of false contexts of the 2A doesn't mean the original meaning is null. Where in the world does this activist judge get off ruling on something that doesn't exist in the constitution?

 

[chucklenut]

Where do these judges get their opinions from?! The 2A says absolutely NOTHING about self defense and all of the primary writings of the day explicitly state that the 2A was put in to keep the .gov in check. It's the final check in 'check and balances'. Just because judges have f'd up and ruled on a myriad of false contexts of the 2A doesn't mean the original meaning is null. Where in the world does this activist judge get off ruling on something that doesn't exist in the constitution?

ftfy