It also sounds like they moved the mic away from the milspec position by lining it up with the end of the barrel and not the end of the silencer
-
If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.
First independent Silencerco Omega tests are not so hot compared to orginal published specs
- Thread starter batoncolle
- Start date
Strictly from a business perspective, they never should have released the initial numbers. Anyone could have predicted the backlash. And consumers are smart enough to figure out that it didn't hit the specified sound reduction. The lack of published independent third party Db tests would speak for itself, similar to how they avoided the subject when the Socom cans came out. Now SS has egg on their face with SCo, risking damage to their relationship. I'm sure it will blow over though. Editing the information with different ammo and test protocols is an obvious attempt to save face.
Just wanted to bump this. I got to actually shoot one myself yesterday on 556 in 14.5 and 10.5 barrels. This thing is mind blowingly quiet, I don't care what the meter says. It sounded BETTER to me on both platforms than even the Specwar 556. We shot the Omega, both Specwars and a Harvester on the guns.
Harvester was actually on a 18.5 only*
Harvester was actually on a 18.5 only*
You always get to play with the cool stuff...lol
Yeahhh Ill stick with my trusty specwar 7.62.
Very very good. Enough to convince the department they wanted it over the specwar 556.
Oh he will. So let the hate flow!~
