Glock "Perfection" Breakdown

[Ben Worthy]

Somebody had to because you sure as **** aren't making it any better.

It was good enough for you to stop by and say hey at least. Care to contribute to our discussion or..?

 

[sublimebeer]

I think I remember gen 3s having issues early on, I'm not completely sure on that. But I know gen 4s had problems and the "gen 5s" are having issues so far.


What repairs did you have to pay for? That's odd.

I bought 3 gen 3's when they hit the market. Zero issues.

 

[Ben Worthy]

I guess if you are a ****ing retard.

So you can shoot a handgun with a 12 pound trigger just as well as you can with a 4 pound?
No? Dramatic but you get the point. It's sorta obvious that a trigger, grip, etc all contribute to how well someone can shoot a particular gun.

 

[Jackie Graham]

I've owned 5 and I would imagine I've fired a couple thousand rounds total through Glocks. They're nothing special.

Did not say they were special. Just easy to shoot, and very reliable. If they ware out Glock fixes them and sends you on you way at no charge.

 

[Ben Worthy]

A butthurt OP tries to justify his purchase

Why would I need to justify a cheaper, superior gun?

 

[Ben Worthy]

That would be the "economical" thing I said. S&W, Sig, HK, Beretta, etc have all GIVEN away guns to PDs to get them to switch. You think Glock is the only company trying to win over police departments?

Certainly not. That's business.

 

[NWSharpshooter]

I've owned 5 and I would imagine I've fired a couple thousand rounds total through Glocks. They're nothing special.

So you can shoot a handgun with a 12 pound trigger just as well as you can with a 4 pound?
No? Dramatic but you get the point. It's sorta obvious that a trigger, grip, etc all contribute to how well someone can shoot a particular gun.

But the Glock doesn't have a 12lb trigger. It is literally point, click, bang.

 

[Ben Worthy]

That was the Sigma they sued S&W over, not the SDVE. The Sigma was known as the SW9VE. S&W had to change the design. That said the metal wasn't tenifer treated, they didn't use the same quality components, and the gun was a total flop.....so much so that they had to redesign it AGAIN and call it something different....the SD9.....which is a flop as well. That's why gun stores have to practically give the piece of **** away and nobody wants them. The whole line was such a failure S&W had to come out with an entirely different design with the M&P line of pistols to try to compete with Glock. They managed to get some PD contracts early, but those are all slowly getting dumped too. Why would a PD dump them and go back to Glock if it was "essentially the same thing?"

So S&W is just giving Glock about $9 per SD because they're friendly?

 

[NWSharpshooter]

Why would I need to justify a cheaper, superior gun?

And what exactly is cheaper than and superior? The SD9?

 

[MRH]

So you can shoot a handgun with a 12 pound trigger just as well as you can with a 4 pound?.

That's why you don't buy the SDVE.

Can you answer one question? Why do you care so much?