What's your rifle set up?I reckon they don't shoot as much as I do lol. Give me any rifle an 8 inch plate and stick me on the mountain a state over I'll still light it up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's your rifle set up?I reckon they don't shoot as much as I do lol. Give me any rifle an 8 inch plate and stick me on the mountain a state over I'll still light it up
One is a Zulu2 223-556. Target with it at 300yards all day.What's your rifle set up?
I think the facetiousness may’ve slid by you brother.300 yards is not that hard to play with. I also target that same 300 yards with a 556. It only 16 inches. The 6.5 is 22 inches. If you can't consistently tag an 8 inch plate at 300 yards. You need to visit your local range a bit more.
And an almost mil at 300 yards. You still will tag it without holding.
But isn't MOA a finer form of adjustment in a manner of speaking? I mean if we are speaking as a matter of fact even though it might not show up a whole heaping load of a lot on the target.OK, one is not intrinsically better than the other. They are both simply a measurement of an angle.
If you can count to 10, mils really are not difficult.
Dialing amd holding both tend to be simpler and faster using mils. 7.2 mils vs 24.75 moa. Very simple. Quicker and easier to read on the turret and on your reticle. And fewer numbers to remember when on the go.
Neither is "wrong," but moa is for unwashed heathen.
This isn't going to age wellBut isn't MOA a finer form of adjustment in a manner of speaking? I mean if we are speaking as a matter of fact even though it might not show up a whole heaping load of a lot on the target.