No, I get your point, but it has little to do with what I'm saying. ....the number of people that carry mouse guns because they greatly overestimate their capabilities is probably substantial. Why would a person that can carry and shoot a 9mm effectively (with a just a little more effort and practice) choose to carry a 25? Because they think it will do much more than it can and that is a very poor tactical decision based on false information.
Bear, it has everything to do with what you are saying. The reason a person would choose a .25 over a 9mm has everything to do with personal preference. I don't carry anything smaller than a .38, but that is my preference. My wife will not carry a .38, but she WILL carry a Ruger .22. While the round is not as effective as others, the round will hurt the attacker and may give her an opportunity to escape the potential danger. I would rather she carry a larger round, but at least she carries something. Regardless of the caliber, she is not looking to get into a fire fight. You continue to use examples of a LEO or Military, my wife is neither. She wants to get away from the danger, and a .22, if it hits the target, will hurt. Hopefully, this will give her a chance to get away from the attacker. I don't know why you don't at least consider this as a reason to carry something less than you suggest. BTW, the smaller the handgun, the more the recoil for some. There are 9mm handguns smaller than my wifes .22, but she doesn't like the recoil. So, is it your opinion, she should not carry at all? My wife does not base her opinion on how badass the round is, or the false information that only you keep bringing up. She carries something is her personal preference and she WILL carry that weapon. I am glad she carries, even if it does not fit your opinion of what she should or should not carry.