With the p320 problems, it’s amazing Sig would push this thing out with existing problems. Sig used to mean quality, now it’s turning into a company that doesn’t mind putting their name on anything from scopes, thermal vision, firearms that aren’t close in quality to what the Sig name used to mean. Very sad.
While it's regrettable that ANY gun manufacturer would push a substandard firearm to market, Sig is not alone in the practice.
I had an early Glock 42 that wouldn't cycle hardly at all, and an early Ruger LC9s Pro that the mag would fall out of while shooting it.
Gen 4 Glock 19's were notoriously bad when they first came out.
I'm not defending Sig, but lets not kid ourselves into thinking they are alone in early run guns functioning sub-par.