what u saw was only 1 instance of a drive by shooting. there were several b4 that was not shown in that video. there's a documentary on the l.a. riots that history channel did a few yrs ago, show much more footage from that incident
OK, got it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what u saw was only 1 instance of a drive by shooting. there were several b4 that was not shown in that video. there's a documentary on the l.a. riots that history channel did a few yrs ago, show much more footage from that incident
Again, that is where we disagree. I just don't think anyone is sitting at a window sill with a rioter in their cross hairs thinking "I'm legal, it's go time!". Legality in life and death situations only comes up AFTER the fact.
Bear, I realize you are trying to have an academic discussion about a particular SHTF scenario but you are crossing the line from what is legal, and what is reality, in a life & death situation. If the two cross paths, it's coincidence.
I would never shoot or not shoot someone based on what is legal. I will shoot someone when and only when I think I am saving my life or that of another, period. There may be a situation where I'd be legally right to shoot someone and wouldn't and vice versa. I'm not going to pretend to have a handle on the myriad of scenarios and laws that would apply or not, as to be blunt.... I don't care. I don't say that in a cavalier fashion either, I say that because my life is either endanger or not. The "law" doesn't get to dictate when I personally get to protect myself when I feel threatened. "The law" is not there to evaluate the situation. I am. The jury can decide if I was 'right'.
Or, my family will be out of harms way (because they will be) and I am alive when it's all over, but have killed someone because of unjustifiable fear and go to jail for about 25 years. I might as well be dead anyway. Wouldn't clarity of mind on what you will do in a riot be a lot better?
Do you really think that considering when deadly force would be legally justified before an incident begins is inappropriate? Really? Seriously?
I don't think it's inappropriate to think about the legality of your actions. It's just when it's appropriate to think about it that matters. I understand you are wanting some type of reassurance after the fact but if I was in a situation that was 100% harmful to me or others I would "shoot first and ask questions later." I would only hope that if I had a gun pointed at my head and you were standing behind the person with a gun, that you would take a clean shot at him without second guessing your future. I would for you and anybody in a heartbeat.
Bear44 it sounds like you need to talk to some of your neighbors and see if they are planning on sticking around or leaving. Kind of like the Asian guys in the video a couple of armed men defending their property is a good deterrent. If not, then you've got some witnesses on your side at the least. Living in the sticks has its advantages....3S's work wonders!