So you want a court case where a judge agreed with a LEO.
-----------------------
I am an engineer so I like to look at the facts. It just irritates the **** out of me when people automatically jump to one extreme or the other. When we had our issues (when I got my sig line) you would always give the LEO a pass and found your statement where a LEO should be trusted more than a judge, silly. Show me the facts then we'll decide. Both parties will give their "side".
Just like this story, the official report is nothing like the news report. I am VERY suspicious of the official report and am a little suspicious of the girl's account of it. I doubt all were on her car right away. Show me the video, I suspect the grocery store has some of the parking lot. If there were in fact 6 agents there I would expect they had at least 1 cam or at least microphone of it. Regardless of the facts here, the LEO's did over react, no night in jail was required.
I also guess it's time for a new sig.
The court case in question here that I was quoting was graham vs. Connor. I don't mind admitting that a leo was wrong, such as my opinion in this case. However I do believe that Monday morning quarterbacking in most situations is inappropriate. But in a case such as this, it appears it was a planned (or lack of) operation, and a lot of things went wrong when they shouldn't have and there is no excuse for it.


